Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A report on improving Canada's long-term care system by the Parliamentary Budget Officer was prepared at the request of Paul Manly, the Green MP for Nanaimo-Ladysmith. It analyzes the costs of implementing M-77, a private member’s motion Mr. Manly presented in March.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Making a set of improvements to Canada’s long-term care system in response to the pandemic would require $13.7-billion in new annual spending, according to a report from the Parliamentary Budget Officer.

That figure includes new money for clearing waiting lists for beds in long-term care homes, adding more hours of care per bed, and increasing wages paid to workers.

The budget officer’s report, released Wednesday, says Canada’s provinces and territories currently allocate a total of $13.6-billion, largely their own funds, to facilities-based long-term care for seniors each year. The federal government provides indirect financial support through the Canada Health Transfer.

Story continues below advertisement

The report was prepared at the request of Paul Manly, the Green MP for Nanaimo-Ladysmith. It analyzes the costs of implementing M-77, a private member’s motion Mr. Manly presented in March.

How COVID-19 exposed long-term health-care issues at Brampton hospital

Alberta report calls for hiring spree in long-term care facilities

The motion calls for a number of changes to Canada’s long-term care system, all aimed at resolving what it calls it a “humanitarian crisis” in Canadian long-term care homes, where thousands of elderly residents died of COVID-19.

The current level of spending provides facilities-based long-term care – meaning care provided in residential facilities, rather than in a patient’s home – to about 205,000 seniors. But the report says there are still 52,000 people on waiting lists.

The budget officer describes Mr. Manly’s motion as proposing “several financially significant” changes to long-term care for seniors, including providing a minimum of four hours of care per resident each day – up from the current average of three hours – and guaranteeing basic long-term care to everyone who needs it.

The $13.7-billion in new annual spending outlined by the budget officer would consist of an $8.5-billion increase in spending on facilities-based care for seniors, and a $5.2-billion increase in spending on home care.

The cost would increase at a rate of 4.1 per cent each year as a result of increasing demand for care and rising wages, the report says.

Mr. Manly’s motion also calls for long-term care staff to be paid “adequately” for their work, and for them to receive benefits and paid sick leave. The report says this would require increasing the average pay and benefits of employees of private long-term care providers to match those of providers at public-sector care homes.

Story continues below advertisement

Implementing that change, the report says, would mean increasing the average wages of workers in private long-term care homes by 15 per cent, from $21.78 an hour to $25.02 an hour, resulting in a $1.1-billion annual increase in the overall cost of the long-term care system.

“When you’re asking for government programs, you need to know how much it is going to cost, and where those costs are going to go,” Mr. Manly said in an interview. “I think the report is fairly clear about what the costs are and where that money needs to be spent.”

Federal NDP health critic Don Davies said in a statement that the report makes it clear that there must be serious investment from all levels of government in long-term care.

“The federal Liberal government should help fund these changes through the Canada Health Transfer immediately,” Mr. Davies said.

In a statement, Scott Bardsley, a spokesperson for Seniors Minister Deb Schulte, said the Liberal government has worked with provinces and territories on issues around long-term care, including some of the items raised in the budget officer’s report.

“We provided support for infection prevention, higher staff wages, rapid tests, PPE, coaching on best practices and infrastructure improvements,” the statement said.

Story continues below advertisement

The statement also noted that several proposals in Mr. Manly’s motion are the responsibility of provinces and territories. “From the outset, we have been clear that we respect their jurisdiction over long-term care,” it said.

In the most recent federal budget, the government promised $3-billion over five years to support provinces and territories in managing long-term care.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies