Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Since 1991, more than 80 Heritage Minutes have chronicled Canada’s history in 60-second bursts of celebration or commemoration. On Wednesday, a new minute will be released that tells the story of what seemed, at the time, a setback in human rights: the 1995 Supreme Court of Canada ruling in Egan v Canada that denied benefits to same-sex couples.

Today, the case is recognized as a landmark in advancing equality, and is the subject of the first Heritage Minute dedicated to the story of Canada’s sexual minorities.

“We wanted to look for a story that had some dramatic impact, was very human, centred around one or two people − because that’s generally the way the minutes work, and which also spoke to essential rights,” said Anthony Wilson-Smith, president of Historica Canada, which produces the minutes. Egan v Canada certainly fits that bill.

Story continues below advertisement

Jim Egan met his life partner, Jack Nesbit, in 1948. At the time, their relationship was criminal; it was a serious felony to engage in same-sex acts in Canada. But rather than hide, Mr. Egan became one of the first Canadians to publicly defend the rights of homosexuals, mostly through letters to newspapers protesting stereotypically hateful depictions of gays.

Mr. Egan turned 65 in 1986 and began receiving a government pension. When Mr. Nesbit subsequently applied for spousal benefits, the federal government rejected the application. Though homosexual acts were now legal in Canada, governments and private-sector employees still discriminated against workers who were gay; some people described the AIDS epidemic as God’s punishment on queers; openly homosexual couples risked harassment and abuse.

But Mr. Egan and Mr. Nesbit decided to test the boundaries of the recently enacted Charter of Rights and Freedoms. They took the government to court.

When Egan v Canada reached the Supreme Court, all nine judges agreed that discriminating against a couple based on their sexuality was a violation of their Charter rights. But five of the judges, through a variety of legal somersaults, found a reason to deny the pension benefits anyway. The men had lost, or so it seemed.

But within a few years, courts were striking down laws discriminating against same-sex couples, and even affirming their right to marry. The principle of equality enshrined in Egan v Canada lasted; the somersaults were forgotten.

“You lost, but then you won,” Mr. Wilson-Smith observes. “… That’s a very similar result to one of our most popular-ever minutes, which is the Viola Desmond minute.” Ms. Desmond was arrested in 1946 for refusing to leave the whites-only section of a New Glasgow, N.S. cinema. Her legal challenge, which she lost, is considered a landmark in advancing civil rights in Canada. Earlier this year, the federal government unveiled a new $10 bill featuring her image.

Heritage Minutes are unique to Canada. Charles Bronfman, the business executive, conceived of them in the 1980s as an antidote to historical ignorance − a 60-second story of a Canadian moment in time. He funded them initially; today most minutes are sponsored by Heritage Canada. Although originally aimed for television, they are now viewed primarily online, with a typical Heritage Minute having between one million and 1.5 million views.

Story continues below advertisement

They will also have an international reach. The famed Mexican director Guillermo del Toro tweets every one. He’s a fan.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies