Skip to main content

Politics Artificial intelligence companies appeal to government for more clarity in Copyright Act

The press secretary for Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains says the government will closely review the industry committee's recommendations on AI.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Artificial intelligence (AI) companies say the government should clarify the legality of using copyrighted materials to train machines.

The call comes as the House of Commons industry committee tabled its review of the Copyright Act to Parliament in June, which included a recommendation to create an exception to allow material to be used for AI development.

Christian Troncoso, policy director at BSA, The Software Alliance, an industry group, said certainty in the act means that companies will have greater confidence investing in the Canadian AI market.

Story continues below advertisement

The uncertainty, Mr. Troncoso said, lies in the process of informational analysis, referring to the process of a computer analyzing data and patterns.

Mr. Troncoso said a computer can be trained to detect objects in a photo by feeding a machine millions of copies of photographs until it can detect patterns and make predictions about objects in the new photo.

The technology has been used in apps designed to help visually impaired individuals identify scenes around them, Mr. Troncoso said. For example, one could take a photo of a street and the app could identify the location of a bus stop.

He said the Copyright Act is “very unclear” on whether copies used for informational analysis constitute copyright infringement.

And while informational analysis encompasses a range of technologies, Mr. Troncoso said many of them boil down to an ability to identify patterns in large sets of data – taken from copies – and then using those patterns to make predictions about new data. He said some provisions for incidental copying cover some forms of informational analysis, but there is not much certainty.

Nevin French, vice-president of policy at the Information Technology Association of Canada, which advocates for a sustainable digital economy, said he was pleased to see the committee’s recommendations to amend the act to “facilitate the use of a work or other subject matter for the purpose of informational analysis.”

He said businesses looking to invest in Canada would consider the copyright regime, the tax system and the availability of tech talent.

Story continues below advertisement

“Certainly, copyright and AI would be a very important element of that,” Mr. French said.

Paul Gagnon, legal counsel at Element AI which develops and delivers AI products, said he looks for clear answers on policy to provide more certainty for his investors.

Bigger, multinational companies aren’t as affected by uncertain policies because they have “deep pockets,” litigators and insurance policies, but he said it can be detrimental for small companies or universities.

“If you’re a startup looking for funding, the fact that you could have one copyright suit pending could be fatal to subsequent funding,” Mr. Gagnon said.

Danielle Keenan, press secretary for Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains, said the government will closely review the committee’s recommendations.

“Our government believes that copyright is a vital part of Canada’s creative, social and economic well-being,” Ms. Keenan said in an e-mailed statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Gagnon and Mr. Troncoso said discussions around informational analysis and exceptions needed for AI have become a global priority. They pointed to the European Union, Japan and Singapore as jurisdictions that are clarifying copyright regimes while competing with Canada for investment and tech talent.

Mr. French said some countries will get it right, and others will get it wrong.

“I think we’ll see countries that get it wrong – companies will be leaving that area,” he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter