Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau promised mental-health transfers to provinces totalling $4.5-billion over five years during a press conference in Kanata, Ont.

Nathan Denette/The Canadian Press

It was hard to tell during Tuesday’s election campaign stops whether it was Justin Trudeau or Erin O’Toole who was doing more to free the country’s politics from the bonds of actual money constraints.

Was it Mr. Trudeau, the Liberal Leader, who declined even to contemplate the notion that high deficits, combined with billions upon billions of dollars in campaign promises, might one day require a shift to a smidge more restraint, or at least some altering of the Liberal spending track?

Or was it Mr. O’Toole, the Conservative Leader, who expressly complained that Mr. Trudeau is recklessly racking up dangerous debt, yet made nothing approaching a substantive commitment to do anything about it? Instead, he promised the budget would be balanced in 10 years, all without cuts.

Story continues below advertisement

Erin O’Toole promises to balance budget ‘without cuts’

Federal government posts $12.7-billion deficit for June as spending drops

So far, the fiscal debate in this election campaign hasn’t attracted any actual participants. It is a chimera of airy disinterest and magical thinking.

It’s obvious that the public isn’t in a mood to hear politicians promising to cut spending, or balance the budget, or tackle the debt. It’s fine for party leaders to argue for greater or lesser public spending. But it would be worth knowing how far they think that spending should go, or under what circumstances they think it should change. Or if they think there should be any limits.

“It’s an open-bar environment,” said Kevin Page, the president of the Institute for Fiscal Studies and Democracy at the University of Ottawa, and a former parliamentary budget officer.

“There are no guardrails. There are really no targets. And there are no budgetary restraints right now.”

Campaigning politicians should make promises to spend on public priorities. On Tuesday, Mr. Trudeau did so in a news conference in a supporter’s backyard in Kanata, Ont., where he promised mental-health transfers to provinces totalling $4.5-billion over five years. Certainly, there is a need for improved mental-health care in Canada – although it would be better if provinces increased their own budgets to pay for those services.

Mr. Trudeau made other billion-dollar promises too, on Sunday and Monday. And he has zero interest in discussing any kind of potential fiscal constraint.

When asked on Tuesday if there might one day be a need to adjust the pace of spending a little, Mr. Trudeau said some pandemic benefits have already ended. He listed groups that still need supports, talked about having Canadians’ backs in a pandemic, and criticized the Conservatives for not understanding that a national child-care plan will drive economic growth. But he never came anywhere near an answer.

Story continues below advertisement

When Mr. O’Toole came out later in the day to criticize the Liberals for taking a reckless fiscal course and racking up dangerous debt, you would have thought he was going to set some of his own parameters for what is prudent, and how he might go about reducing deficits and debt. Nope.

So far, his marquee fiscal commitment, if you can call it that, is to balance the budget in 10 years. So, if elected, an Erin O’Toole Conservative government would leave balancing the budget to whatever government takes office afterward. “I don’t know what it means,” Mr. Page said.

As Mr. Page noted, you don’t have to promise a balanced budget to set targets. You can express a target for the deficit as a per cent of GDP, or make a pledge to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio.

Mr. O’Toole also promised to balance the budget without cuts. It stretches credulity for him to say that out-of-control Liberal spending is sending public finances off a cliff, but if the Conservatives are elected the government’s books will sort themselves out.

There are already questions about whether the Conservatives are counting on stronger-than-expected economic growth for their calculations. And there can be a lot of semantic debates about what counts as a cut.

And Mr. Page notes that Conservatives have made a long list of promises, too, including one very expensive one: a 6-per-cent annual increase in health care transfers to the provinces. It’s hard to imagine how these spending pledges will fit in with a balanced budget without cuts, even in a decade.

Story continues below advertisement

There is some hope for members of the public who are trying to guess the quantum of each party’s promises. The parties are expected to release costings reviewed by Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux before the end of the campaign. But those numbers will not be the whole answer. What will these leaders do if things change? Are there limits? So far, it’s an open bar.

Follow the party leaders and where they stand on the issues this election campaign by signing up for our Morning or Evening Update newsletters.

For subscribers only: Get exclusive political news and analysis by signing up for the Politics Briefing.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies