Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

People line up to get their COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination centre, June 10, 2021, in Montreal.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

The federal government released all of its largest COVID-19 vaccine contracts late on Friday, but heavy redactions prevent the public from seeing much of the relevant information, including the prices per dose and the delivery schedules for the shots.

The 364-page document containing Canada’s contracts with its seven vaccine suppliers was sent to members of the House of Commons health committee, which has been studying the federal pandemic response. This is the first time the government has released any part of the contracts. Novavax Inc. released a redacted version of its contract in its U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings in March.

Opposition parties ordered the government to release the contracts as part of a sweeping document request related to the COVID-19 pandemic in October. At the time, government ministers said the release of the documents could jeopardize Canada’s ability to secure vaccines. Since then, redacted documents have been released semi-regularly to the health committee, often late on a Friday.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada vaccine tracker: How many COVID-19 doses have been administered so far?

Am I eligible for a first or second COVID-19 vaccine dose? The latest rules by province

COVID-19 vaccine questions answered: dose mixing, life after the vaccine and more

“There’s no reason why Canadians shouldn’t have access to details given the amount of public expenditure,” Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said, adding it should not have taken eight months to release the limited information.

With so much redacted from the AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, Sanofi/GSK, Medicago, and Janssen contracts, one expert said it is impossible to know whether Canada negotiated competitive prices and what assurances it negotiated for the delivery schedules. Delayed and smaller-than-expected deliveries dramatically slowed the first phase of Canada’s vaccination campaign, but since April, the size and number of deliveries have increase significantly.

The information released in the contracts shows a “very, very partial picture,” said Matthew Herder, director of the Health Law Institute at Dalhousie University. “The government took every opportunity to redact as much as possible … so clearly there are things they don’t want the public seeing.

“That might be the companies that push for that, it could be the government, it could be both,” he added.

For example, the government fully or partly redacted more than 20 pages of the Moderna contract, and in several cases also withheld the terms listed in the definitions section.

“The redactions are profound and they go beyond what I have seen in a number of contracts that I’ve received through Access to Information,” Prof. Herder said.

Canada has bought 249 million doses from the seven suppliers, and has options to buy 153 million more. In April, the government pegged the total cost of its vaccine contracts at more than $9-billion, but provided no other specifics.

Story continues below advertisement

The unredacted parts of the contracts show that for AstraZeneca and Novavax, the government negotiated that the companies use “commercially reasonable efforts” to deliver the vaccine doses within the terms of the agreement. That performance standard is not mentioned in the unredacted sections of the Pfizer and Moderna contracts. The wording is weaker than the language used in the European Union’s AstraZeneca contract, Prof. Herder said.

Procurement Minister Anita Anand’s signature is on the contracts, but her office declined to respond to The Globe and Mail’s requests for comment and directed inquiries to the department’s media team.

Spokesperson Jeremy Link said the government worked with the companies to “secure their agreement on publicly releasable versions” of the contracts. While they are all different, he said each was negotiated with the “sole intent” of getting vaccines as quickly as possible.

In a letter to the committee’s clerk about the redactions, the Procurement Department’s assistant deputy minister, James Stott, said the documents were released in line with the requirements of the Access to Information Act.

“Applicable exemptions have been applied to the documents to protect third-party or personal information, as well as to avoid jeopardizing orders or compromising Canada’s negotiating position given the volatility of the marketplace,” Mr. Stott wrote.

Ms. Rempel Garner said experts told the health committee transparency would ensure Canada got a better deal for the shots, help dispel vaccine hesitancy, and clarify how Canada can help with the international vaccination effort, because at least some of the contracts cover the parameters in which Canada can donate surplus doses.

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies