Skip to main content

New NATO figures published ahead of the London summit estimate Canada will spend only around 1.31 per cent of its GDP on its military this year.

Lars Hagberg/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is likely to face questions from other leaders of the NATO military alliance next week as new figures show Canadian military spending is expected to remain stagnant this year.

All NATO members agreed in 2014 to work toward spending two per cent of their gross domestic products on defence within a decade, a pledge that has taken on added significance thanks to U.S. President Donald Trump.

Yet new NATO figures published Friday estimate Canada will spend about 1.31 per cent of its GDP on its military this year — the same as last year. That leaves Canada 20th out of NATO’s 29 members in terms of GDP spent on defence. Nine NATO members met the two per cent target.

Story continues below advertisement

Allies also agreed in 2014 to direct 20 per cent of their defence spending toward equipment. Canada’s proportion is expected to increase to 13.3 per cent from 11.9, but it stands to be ranked 24th out of 29 members.

The topic of defence spending is expected to figure prominently in discussions when Mr. Trudeau and other NATO leaders gather in London, England, next week for the 70th birthday of the alliance, which was created in 1949 to protect North America and western Europe from the Soviet Union.

Mr. Trump has driven much of that discussion by publicly berating some European allies for not spending more on their own defence, while he and his administration have also publicly and privately expressed frustration with Canada’s own military investments.

“President Trump is right about the importance of European allies and Canada spending more,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said during a news conference Friday.

“And he has conveyed that message very clearly to allies several times. But European allies and Canada should not invest in defence to please President Trump. They should invest in defence because we are faced with new threats and new challenges.”

The federal government has suggested this country’s military spending will increase substantially over the next decade as it starts to buy new fighter jets and warships, which together are expected to cost about $70-billion.

Yet the Liberal government’s defence policy from 2017 shows spending reaching only 1.4 per cent of GDP by 2024-25, underscoring Canada’s longstanding resistance to the two per cent target despite having agreed to it.

Story continues below advertisement

The government has instead repeatedly pointed to Canada leading a battle group in Latvia and providing military trainers in Iraq, fighter jets in Romania and a frigate in the Mediterranean as a better measurement of its commitment to the alliance.

According to the Prime Minister’s Office, Mr. Trudeau “reiterated Canada’s steadfast commitment to the alliance and our ongoing contributions to key NATO missions across the spectrum of its operations” in a phone call with Mr. Stoltenberg on Friday.

To meet the two-per-cent target, Canada would need to spend $33.4-billion — or about $11-billion more — on defence this year.

“The newly released numbers by NATO make it clear that under Justin Trudeau, Canada is not meeting our NATO commitments and he has no plan to reach them,” Conservative defence critic James Bezan said in a statement Friday.

“The number of allies hitting the two per cent of GDP mark has gone from three to nine, but Canada still trails behind and our defence spending has stagnated for the last two years. It’s embarrassing we are missing the mark on overall investments in our national defence.”

Mr. Trump personally expressed frustration about Canada’s defence spending in a letter to Mr. Trudeau ahead of last year’s NATO summit in Brussels.

Story continues below advertisement

“As one of our most capable allies and a leader in worldwide security, Canada’s continued defence spending of less than two per cent undermines the security of the alliance and provides validation for other allies that also are not meeting their defence spending commitments,” the letter said.

“At the summit, we must ensure alliance credibility by living up to our agreed commitments. I expect to see a strong recommitment by Canada to meet the goals to which we have all agreed in the defence investment pledge.”

The Liberals actually changed the way Canada reports its defence spending to NATO when it unveiled their defence policy, largely to ensure the country’s investments were being properly acknowledged amid U.S. pressure to spend more.

That change, which was approved by NATO, saw the government include the cost of some veterans’ programs, deploying police on peacekeeping missions, coast guard operations and even computer support in the overall number.

That is the same number as last year and leaves Canada 20th out of NATO’s 29 members in terms of GDP spent on the military.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies