Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan speaks at an announcement on fighter jets as General Jonathan Vance, Chief of the Defence Staff looks on at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on Dec. 12, 2017.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Most Canadians do not have confidence that the Canadian military can change its culture, and believe the federal government is doing a poor job dealing with allegations of sexual misconduct and discrimination in the forces, a new Nanos Research survey shows.

The Canadian Armed Forces have faced criticism amid military police investigations into allegations of sexual misconduct involving former chief of the defence staff Jonathan Vance, his successor Admiral Art McDonald, and Vice-Admiral Haydn Edmundson.

Twenty-six per cent of those surveyed by Nanos Research said they are not confident that the military can change its culture in the long run to be welcoming to everyone; 30 per cent said they are somewhat not confident. Only 13 per cent said they are confident and 29 per cent said they are somewhat confident. The rest said they are unsure.

Story continues below advertisement

The Nanos survey, which was commissioned by The Globe and Mail and CTV News, found that a majority of Canadians believe that the government is handling the situation poorly. Twenty-one per cent of respondents said the Liberal government is doing a very poor job, and 33 per cent said it is doing a poor job, at investigating allegations of sexual misconduct and discrimination in the forces. One per cent said Ottawa is doing a very good job, 7 per cent said it is doing a good job and 27 per cent said it is doing an average job. Ten per cent of respondents said they are not sure.

It also shows that older Canadians are particularly critical of the way the government has reacted. Twenty-five per cent of respondents over the age of 55 said Ottawa is doing a very poor job, compared with 15 per cent of respondents aged 18 to 34.

In recent weeks, the Liberal government has faced political pressure from opposition parties over how it addressed concerns about Mr. Vance.

Conservative MP James Bezan said the morale of the Forces has been greatly damaged because of the allegations rocking the military.

“I believe trust in leadership and trust in the political leadership of the current government has eroded to a level that leads a lot of members questioning their own participation in the Forces.”

A culture change requires effort at all levels within the Forces, the Department of National Defence (DND) and the government, he said, adding that proper processes and mechanisms must be in place so that those who serve in uniform can do so in a harassment-free environment.

Global News was first to report that Mr. Vance is facing accusations of inappropriate behaviour with two female subordinates while he was chief of the defence staff. Mr. Vance has denied any wrongdoing. He was appointed chief of the defence staff, head of the Canadian Armed Forces, in 2015 and retired last year.

Story continues below advertisement

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said this week that he did not personally know of the situation regarding Mr. Vance. However, the matter was brought to the attention of his office in 2018, The Globe reported.

Questions around how Mr. Trudeau’s government responded began in early March, when former military ombudsman Gary Walbourne testified before a parliamentary committee that he tried to show Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan evidence of an allegation and that the minister refused to see what he had.

Mr. Sajjan told the House of Commons defence committee that he did everything he could, including alerting his chief of staff, who flagged the matter with the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).

The PMO followed up with the Privy Council Office (PCO), the department that supports the prime minister and cabinet. The PCO’S Janine Sherman met with Mr. Walbourne, but was not able to obtain any more information. Mr. Walbourne has said repeatedly that he did not have the complainant’s permission to investigate, and that he had to respect her wishes.

Todd Lane, a spokesman for Mr. Sajjan, said that the minister has been working with the acting chief of defence staff, the deputy minister and stakeholders on how to regain the trust of those affected by all forms of sexual misconduct.

“As the minister has stated, the time for patience is over,” Mr. Lane said. “We must change the culture of the Canadian Armed Forces to create a safe and welcoming workplace. We need to make sure that no member is afraid to bring forward any form of complaint and if or when they do, that they feel supported.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Sajjan, the Forces and the DND are developing a plan focused on culture change, Mr. Lane added.

“We need to redouble our efforts to change the culture of toxic masculinity and eliminate sexual misconduct in the Canadian Armed Forces. We owe it to our members and to Canadians to get this right.”

Nanos Research randomly surveyed 1,007 Canadians, 18 years or older, and participants were recruited by live agents by phone, both landline and cell, and in a survey administered online. The margin of error for the survey is 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies