Skip to main content

The RCMP arrested Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou at Vancouver’s airport on Dec. 1, 2018, at the request of the United States, which is seeking her extradition on fraud charges. Meng denies the allegations and also accuses Canadian authorities of violating her rights during the arrest.

Lindsey Wasson/Reuters

The international spotlight will be turned on British Columbia’s Supreme Court this month as Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou’s extradition hearing is set to begin, more than a year after her arrest shattered Canada-China relations.

Beijing’s detainment of two Canadians and its restriction of some imports including canola have left many observers eager for a resolution. Some are hopeful the court process will bring relief, while others want Justice Minister David Lametti to step in.

Mr. Lametti has the legal authority to stop the process at any time, extradition lawyer Gary Botting said.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s really silliness for him to say he has to obey the rule of law because it’s before the courts. No. What [the law] says is that he can stop the whole process and the courts must comply with whatever he decides,” Mr. Botting said.

The RCMP arrested Ms. Meng at Vancouver’s airport on Dec. 1, 2018, at the request of the United States, which is seeking her extradition on fraud charges. Ms. Meng denies the allegations and also accuses Canadian authorities of violating her rights during the arrest.

The Huawei chief financial officer is on bail and living in one of her two multimillion-dollar homes in Vancouver. A hearing is set to begin on Jan. 20, focusing on the test of dual criminality, or whether the U.S. allegations would also be a crime in Canada.

If the judge rules the test has not been met, Ms. Meng will be free to leave Canada, although she’ll still have to avoid the U.S. if she wants to evade the charges. If the judge finds there is dual criminality, the hearing will proceed to a second phase.

The second phase, scheduled for June, will consider defence allegations that the Canada Border Services Agency, the RCMP and the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation conspired to conduct a “covert criminal investigation” at the airport.

Border officers detained Ms. Meng for three hours, seized her electronic devices and passcodes and handed them to the RCMP. Ms. Meng did not have access to a lawyer during the detainment and a border guard questioned her about Huawei’s business in Iran.

A lawyer for the Attorney-General of Canada has said border officers are required by law to conduct an admissibility examination on all travellers entering Canada and the passcodes were given to the Mounties by mistake.

Story continues below advertisement

The turmoil could have been avoided, Mr. Botting said, had former justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould declined the U.S. request to arrest Ms. Meng in the first place. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has also said he was informed of the arrest before it occurred.

“Jody Wilson-Raybould got it wrong on this and so did the prime minister,” Mr. Botting said.

It’s unclear what rejecting the request might have meant for the relationship between the two close allies. But Mr. Botting argued that – both then and now – tossing the Meng case wouldn’t have much of an effect.

“There are just so many layers of nonsense that are going on in North America, generally, between the United States and Canada, that it would get lost in the shuffle.”

The Justice Department said the minister does not make any decisions related to extradition until and unless a judge commits the person for extradition. At that point, the minister decides whether to surrender the individual to the requesting country.

“This speaks to the independence of Canada’s judicial system,” the department said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Wilson-Raybould, now an independent MP, did not respond to a request for comment.

The justice minister can legally halt the process at any time, but in practice the minister has not used that power, said Yves Tiberghien, a political science professor and Asia expert at the University of British Columbia.

It would be politically risky to step in now, Dr. Tiberghien said.

“It’s true that the cost of this case is enormous. Essentially, the relationship between Canada and China is frozen when China is the second-largest economy in the world, second most-powerful country in the world,” he said.

“On the other hand, because we’re over a year after the start of the case, and for the whole year Canada has justified the case as being one of strict following … of the rule of law, to intervene now looks like we’re buckling.”

He added that if the court hearings go according to schedule, there is an incentive for the minister to wait for a ruling.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s so much cleaner if the court does it. Then there’s no question about it. It’s proper.”

About 88 per cent of people arrested in Canada at the request of the United States were surrendered for extradition between 2008 and 2018, Department of Justice statistics show.

The fraud charges against Ms. Meng are based on an allegation that she lied about Huawei’s relationship with its Iran-based affiliate, Skycom, to one of its bankers, HSBC.

Her legal team has argued the alleged misrepresentation does not amount to fraud. The defence says the case is really about the United States seeking to enforce its sanctions against Iran even though Canada has no such sanctions.

A lawyer for the Attorney-General has called the argument a “complete red herring.”

Seth Weinstein, a criminal defence lawyer with Greenspan Humphrey Weinstein, said if the judge finds the allegations are focused on sanctions and not fraud, then they would not meet the test of dual criminality.

Story continues below advertisement

As for the defence’s claim that Ms. Meng’s rights were violated at the airport, if those arguments are successful, then it would be concerning for Canada as a country of the “rule of law,” Mr. Weinstein said.

“But, assuming that finding were to be made, we have judicial oversight of police misconduct that ensures that the person’s rights are protected,” he said.

Abuses of process have been found in extradition cases in the past and they didn’t cause irreparable damage to U.S.-Canadian relations, Mr. Weinstein added.

Mr. Botting said the U.S. would likely ask another ally for a provisional arrest warrant and “be more careful next time.”

“They’d say, ‘Oh, too bad. Okay, I’m going home with my marbles. Shucks.’”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies