Skip to main content

Politics Conservative premiers accuse Trudeau of ‘moving the goalposts' on carbon emissions reduction plan

Conservative premiers are accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of “moving the goalposts" on the national plan to reduce carbon emissions by demanding deeper cuts than previously set – even as some provinces chafe at the imposition of a carbon tax.

Premiers emerged from a first ministers' meeting on Friday to say there was agreement on some issues, especially the need to reduce barriers to interprovincial trade.

But Ontario Premier Doug Ford said Mr. Trudeau surprised the premiers by saying he expected some provinces to reduce emissions by more than 30 per cent over 2005 levels by 2030 – the target adopted for the country as a whole – because others, notably Alberta and Saskatchewan, cannot reach that goal.

Story continues below advertisement

The premiers of Ontario and Saskatchewan say the federal government has shifted the greenhouse-gas emissions targets for the provinces. Federal Environment Minister Catherine McKenna says Ottawa “did not move the goalposts.” The Canadian Press

Ontario says it has devised a plan to meet the 30-per-cent target, one that is far less ambitious than the goal set by the former Liberal government under Kathleen Wynne.

“But all of a sudden, we have a little surprise in the room, the goalposts got changed,” Mr. Ford said. “After everyone signed on to 30 per cent, some will carry more water than other provinces. That sets uncertainly within our economy, within manufacturing."

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe also accused the federal Liberal government of revising it targets. “With this discussion today, that is essentially moving the goalposts,” Mr. Moe said.

But he would not elaborate on how he believes the federal position has changed. And Mr. Moe seemed to contradict Mr. Ford by telling reporters that the last pan-Canadian agreement on climate change said each province would contribute to emissions reduction to the degree of its own capabilities.

The Trudeau government had been counting on more ambitious efforts by Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia to make up for slower progress in the two prairie provinces that rely heavily on oil and gas production and coal-fired electricity.

Mr. Trudeau characterized the carbon-reduction plan devised by Ontario’s Conservative government as a step backward.

“We have an approach that recognizes Canada’s targets are national targets. [Mr. Ford] wants to play games with numbers. But what is clear is, we are going to move forward as we always have in a very consistent way. If anyone is moving goalposts, it’s Premier Ford,” Mr. Trudeau said.

Story continues below advertisement

After Doug Ford claimed the prime minister shifted the goalposts on Canada’s climate-change plans, Justin Trudeau responded by suggesting it is the Ontario premier who is “moving the goalposts.” The Canadian Press

Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil, meanwhile, said he did not share Mr. Ford’s interpretation of the discussion.

“Mr. Trudeau said some provinces would end up doing more than the 30-per-cent target based on what is happening in their jurisdiction. Some provinces are going to achieve more than others,” Mr. McNeil said, adding Nova Scotia will probably cut emissions by 50 per cent by 2030.

Saskatchewan, Ontario and New Brunswick are going to court to challenge the constitutionality of Ottawa’s move to implement its climate-change plan by imposing a carbon tax in jurisdictions that don’t have their own broad-based emissions strategy.

Although it was predicted that political divisions and disagreements over the carbon tax would lead to tense discussions at the first ministers’ table, premiers characterized the meeting as being both amicable and productive.

But Alberta Premier Rachel Notley said she had to get her “elbows up” as she called for urgent action to mitigate the combined effects of a sharp increase in production of crude and a shortage of pipeline and rail capacity to get the oil to markets. Alberta has curtailed its production by about 325,000 barrels a day to ease what Ms. Notley describes as a “price crisis” that sees the rest of the world sell its oil at about US$50 a barrel, while Alberta earns just US$10.

“When Alberta’s oil is sold in Canada, the profit from it actually goes back to Canada,” Ms. Notley said. “So it makes sense for all of Canada to be more strategic around this.”

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Notley said premiers from across Canada spoke about the importance of prosperity in Alberta and Saskatchewan, which is also heavily dependent on the oil sector, to the health of the national economy.

Quebec Premier François Legault, however, reiterated his position that opposition to any pipeline is too intense in Quebec to even consider it. “I’m not at all embarrassed to refuse dirty energy when we have clean energy,” Mr. Legault said.

Mr. Trudeau went into the meeting being able to boast about a healthy economy, with the release of numbers on Friday from Statistics Canada that showed Canada had gained 94,100 jobs in November and the unemployment rate had fallen to 5.6 per cent – a 40-year low.

Even Alberta added 24,000 jobs and saw its unemployment rate decline to 6.3 per cent, which was a drop of one percentage point.

Ms. Notley acknowledged that job growth: “But it is threatened if we don’t take charge of the situation with the discounted price in oil.”

On interprovincial trade, Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister noted the progress that has taken in place in eliminating barriers and cutting tariffs over the past two years, and that positive effort continued at Friday’s meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

The barriers “are antiquated; there is no reason for them to exist," Mr. Pallister said. “There is a commitment to work together and that is critical.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter