Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, delivers a statement during a media availability on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on March 11, 2021.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

A Conservative senator is proposing changes to the Criminal Code’s definition of exploitation in human trafficking offences so that the Crown is no longer required to prove a reasonable person in the victim’s circumstances feared for their safety or the safety of someone they know.

Salma Ataullahjan introduced legislation in the Senate this week that proposes removing language in the Criminal Code that deals with fear for safety.

“How do you prove fear?” Ms. Ataullahjan said in an interview with The Globe and Mail. “It’s not a partisan bill. It’s about our children. It’s about young women being trafficked and I’m hoping it will pass quickly. I really don’t think anybody will have a problem with this.”

Story continues below advertisement

Currently, the Criminal Code states that for the purpose of trafficking offences, a person exploits another person if they cause someone to provide, or offer to provide, labour or a service by engaging in conduct that in all circumstances “could reasonably be expected to cause the other person to believe that their safety or the safety of a person known to them would be threatened if they failed to provide, or offer to provide, the labour or service.”

Legal experts have said this definition can make it challenging for the Crown to secure a human trafficking conviction.

Nicole Barrett, director of the International Justice and Human Rights Clinic at Allard Law, University of British Columbia, said in a previous interview with The Globe that the provision in the Criminal Code that deals with safety does not accurately reflect what’s going on in the crime. She said if the victim knows the trafficker – which is usually the case – they may not fear them or it might be a complex mix of feelings because of the trauma they’ve endured.

Rachel Rappaport, a spokesperson for Justice Minister David Lametti, said the government follows all proposed legislation closely as it makes its way through the parliamentary process.

“As with any Private Member’s Bill or Senate Public Bill, we will take the time to review the specific bill under consideration prior to determining the government’s position,” she said.

Legislation introduced by senators must be approved by both the Senate and the House of Commons, meaning the bill faces long odds of becoming law on its own. However such bills can prompt debate and are sometimes incorporated into future government bills.

Ms. Ataullahjan said by amending the Criminal Code to reflect the international definition of trafficking outlined in the Palermo Protocol – a UN measure to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons especially women and children – Crown prosecutors will be enabled to efficiently convict traffickers.

Story continues below advertisement

She said the bill was proposed in collaboration with Conservative MPs Colin Carrie and Arnold Viersen.

Mr. Carrie said in a statement that it’s the moral duty of lawmakers to provide Crown prosecutors with the tools they need, and to remove barriers within the Criminal Code. Mr. Viersen said the weight of human trafficking convictions rests on the victim’s testimony instead of the actions of the traffickers, and the bill will assist survivors and increase convictions.

Julia Drydyk, executive director of The Canadian Centre to End Human Trafficking, said these changes, which have been previously recommended by the centre, will prevent further victimization when victims and survivors try to seek help from the criminal justice system.

“Survivors will only come forward if the system assists and empowers them,” she said.

The centre released a report last month detailing the routes traffickers use to transport victims of sex trafficking around the country.

It recommended governments explore ways to increase rates of prosecution by making the judicial process less traumatizing for survivors and to invest in establishing a number of expert witnesses who can participate in trials to help reduce the burden of proof on the survivor’s testimony.

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies