Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The Official Opposition has told Prime Minister Justin Trudeau it will boycott a review body he established to give a select group of MPs and senators access to top-secret information because, they allege, he is using this committee to duck a request for documents from the House of Commons.

Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole wrote Mr. Trudeau a letter Thursday saying his party will not participate in meetings of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) as long as his government refuses to provide uncensored records to the Commons regarding the firing of scientists from Canada’s top infectious disease lab.

Mr. O’Toole notes the Liberals have declined to comply with an order of the House to turn over the documents.

Story continues below advertisement

“As long as you continue to defy this order, Conservatives will not participate in NSICOP,” Mr. O’Toole said.

“To do so would only legitimize your unethical conduct.”

The minority Liberal government has not complied with a June 2 motion passed by opposition parties in the Commons to produce unredacted documents that provide more details on why scientists Xiangguo Qiu and Keding Cheng were expelled from the Winnipeg National Microbiology Lab and later fired. There are an estimated 250 pages of documents that are censored in their entirety that have been withheld from both the Commons and the special Commons committee on Canada-China.

The government including Health Minister Patricia Hajdu has been adamant this would jeopardize national security. She told MPs that allowing them access to this information would be “putting Canada’s national security at risk.”

The Liberals have instead said they would provide the uncensored records to NSICOP. Its membership, which is appointed by the prime minister, includes three Liberal MPs, two Conservative MPs, a New Democrat and a Bloc Quebecois and several senators.

The Conservatives have objected, noting NSICOP is not a committee of Parliament and is under the control of the Prime Minister’s Office. It’s a “committee of the Prime Minister’s Office, not of the Parliament of Canada,” Mr. O’Toole wrote to Mr. Trudeau.

Stephanie Carvin, a former national security adviser who is now an associate professor of international relations at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, said the Conservative move may be symbolic but it’s another blow to the NSICOP by the Conservatives “who seem fairly intent on undermining it.” Prof. Carvin said she understands the Conservative’s frustration with the stonewalling at details of what happened at the National Microbiology Lab, but she said the party is “using a bulldozer when a scalpel is needed.”

Story continues below advertisement

On Wednesday, Commons Speaker Anthony Rota ruled the Liberal government breached parliamentary privileges by failing to provide secret documents to the House that would explain the firing of two scientists from the Winnipeg lab.

On Wednesday night, the Conservatives put forward a follow-up motion that would declare the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) in contempt of Parliament for refusing to release the documents and to order its head, Iain Stewart, to appear before the Commons to be admonished and produce the requested documents. A vote is expected on Thursday.

Dr. Qiu, former head of a vaccine-development and anti-viral therapy program at the lab, and her biologist husband, Dr. Cheng, have been the focus of parliamentary debate for weeks as opposition MPs have sought information on why they were fired. Scrutiny has also focused on shipments of two powerful viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology in March, 2019, that were overseen by Dr. Qiu.

The June 2 motion supported by the Conservatives, Bloc Québécois and NDP demanded that PHAC turn over more than 250 pages of records about the couple’s dismissal and the shipments.

The motion called on the Commons law clerk to review the documents and redact information that could be injurious to national security or a continuing criminal investigation before making them public.

The motion also called for the clerk to later hold a confidential meeting with MPs on the Canada-China committee to reveal the parts that were removed so they could use them to inform any recommendations or report on the matter.

Story continues below advertisement

The Conservatives have repeatedly pointed to a 2010 ruling by former Commons speaker Peter Milliken that Parliament had an unabridged right to demand internal documents on Canada’s handling of Afghan prisoners, and the government lacked a unilateral power to censor them. The minority Conservative government and opposition parties struck a deal for a small committee of MPs from all parties to review unfiltered versions of the records.

Mr. Chong said he believes the government is afraid information revealed to Parliament about the activities of the two scientists would show there were serious security breaches at the laboratory.

The Globe and Mail reported in May that Canada’s spy agency urged the removal of security clearances for the two scientists and a number of Dr. Qiu’s students from China relating to the Wuhan facility and other national-security matters.

Four months before the couple were expelled from the lab in 2019, documents obtained under an access to information request show Dr. Qiu played a role in shipping the two viruses – Ebola and Henipah – to the Wuhan institute.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies