Skip to main content

Politics More Canadians are relying on EI sickness benefits and staying on them longer

More and more Canadians are applying for federal help as they take time away from work to battle serious illness — and almost four out of every 10 applicants are maxing out their benefits.

Since 2015, demand for sickness benefits under the federal employment insurance program has reached a 10-year high, with more than half of successful applicants taking 10 or more weeks’ worth of payments.

The figures, contained in a recent report to Parliament, show more than 142,000 people used their maximum allotment of 15 weeks in 2017, an increase of about eight per cent from the previous year. The most recent report on the EI system for the fiscal year ending March, 2017, found the duration of benefits increased with age, with those over 55 using an average of 10.5 weeks of benefits.

Story continues below advertisement

Sickness benefits cost the EI system $1.6-billion in 2017.

There aren’t any scientific studies on the people who rely on sickness benefits to provide a definitive explanation about what is fuelling the increase in demand, said Donna Wood, an expert on the EI system from the University of Victoria.

Nor do there appear to be many demands for changes even as demand increases, she said.

“Every year, sickness benefits continue to go up,” Prof. Wood said. “In terms of policy change, nothing has changed. It’s still 15 weeks of benefits and nobody seems to pay that much attention to it.”

Since 2015, the Liberals have changed eligibility rules for regular employment insurance benefits, extended parental leave to 18 months without adding any extra money, created five weeks of optional leave for non-birthing parents and expanded the scope of compassionate care leave.

But sickness benefits have thus far not been targeted for any major changes, leaving it as the only one of the so-called special EI benefits that hasn’t received a Liberal makeover.

The federal department overseeing the program is scheduled to conduct an evaluation on the benefit this fiscal year.

Story continues below advertisement

NDP jobs critic Niki Ashton said the fact that so many people are using up their benefit is evidence that the 47-year-old program needs an update.

“We’ve heard from folks with heartbreaking stories about the stress that comes with having to be right back at work, or be back at work when you’re still not well,” Ms. Ashton said.

“This is a benefit that is there to support people in getting better, rather than contributing to them becoming worse off.”

Michael Brewster, a spokesman for Social Development Minister Jean-Yves Duclos, said the government has already made improvements to sickness benefits to give people more options for returning to work.

In the 2018 budget, the Liberal government agreed to allow new parents and those recovering from illnesses to work while receiving benefits without jeopardizing their EI payments.

“It will soon be possible for people who are sick and who choose to go back to work part time to do so while continuing to receive benefits,” Brewster said.

Story continues below advertisement

“The important work of improving our EI system continues as we ensure it is responsive to the reality of today’s families.”

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter