Skip to main content

Elections Canada is cancelling a $650,000 campaign to hire social-media influencers after a final review found comments from some of the online stars that could be viewed as partisan.

As it cancelled the program, the agency identified the names of the 13 influencers on Thursday. A review of the influencers’ online comments by The Globe and Mail found one had called in 2015 for Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper to be voted out of office. Another was quoted in 2016 as describing Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as “really dreamy.”

Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault had told The Globe in an interview that the influencers were required to sign pledges promising to remain politically neutral in their public comments during the election campaign and for a year after the scheduled Oct. 21 vote.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Perrault also said Elections Canada screened the public comments of potential candidates to ensure the non-partisan agency did not hire personalities who have been associated with any political party.

However, in a news release on Thursday, Mr. Perrault said a final vetting of the proposed influencers revealed some past activities that could be perceived as partisan in nature.

“I did not have the necessary reassurances I needed to make sure that Elections Canada would maintain our organizational reputation for unimpeachable neutrality,” Mr. Perrault said in a statement.

The agency declined to identify the comments that prompted concern.

Details of the campaign to encourage youth registration ahead of the 2019 election were first reported this month by The Globe. News of the campaign provoked sharp criticism from Conservative MPs who called for it to be cancelled.

For the first time, Elections Canada also released the names of the social-media influencers. They are First Nations activist and actor Ashley Callingbull; Olympians Andre De Grasse, Penny Oleksiak and Max Perrot; YouTubers Mitch Hughes, Elle Mills and Lilly Singh; comedian Katherine Levac; TV host Maripier Morin; singer-songwriter Alex Nevsky; TV host Nicolas Ouellet; lifestyle blogger Thanh Phung and disability-issues activist Maayan Ziv.

Majority of poll respondents express support for extending privacy laws to political parties

Canadian voters need to consume news critically as election-meddling threats loom over federal election, NATO researchers say

Opinion: Politicians say they care about privacy. So why can political parties ignore privacy law?

Shortly after becoming the first Indigenous woman to be chosen as Miss Canada and then Miss Universe, Ms. Callingbull posted a political statement on Twitter in August of 2015.

Story continues below advertisement

“I urge all First Nations people in Canada to vote in this upcoming election. We are in desperate need of a new PM. Fight for your rights,” she wrote.

Meanwhile, Ms. Ziv was quoted in a Dec. 14, 2016, Flare article speaking highly of Mr. Trudeau.

“He comes in the room and there’s this glow – I can’t really explain it,” she is quoted as saying as she praised the Prime Minister’s comments on accessibility issues. “He is really dreamy.”

An Elections Canada spokesperson said most of the $650,000 has been spent.

The agency said it hired two outside firms with expertise in social-media talent to screen potential candidates.

“Both agencies were responsible for conducting vetting of any proposed influencers. Over 100 potential influencers were eliminated through this process. We are in discussions at this time to determine how some of the activities in question were not identified earlier in the vetting process,” Elections Canada said in an e-mail. “We are working with the agencies to recuperate some of the costs.”

Story continues below advertisement

Conservative MP Stephanie Kusie, her party’s democratic institutions critic, said she isn’t surprised that a review of the influencers’ activities found partisan comments.

She said that is why Conservatives “were so adamant in our objections to their use from the beginning.”

“Canadians expect Elections Canada to remain focused on administering free and fair elections,” she said.

Related Election Topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter