Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Minister of Environment and Climate Change Jonathan Wilkinson, left, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Minister of Infrastructure and Communities Catherine McKenna at a press conference at the Ornamental Gardens in Ottawa on Nov. 19, 2020.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Canada’s environment minister has proposed changes to the bill that would make the federal government more accountable as it strives to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

The proposed legislation was introduced last fall, but has been at the second-reading stage in the House of Commons, where the minority Liberal government generally needs the support of at least one major opposition party to get bills passed.

Bill C-12 would require that starting in 2030, Ottawa set rolling, five-year targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions ending in 2050, when this pollution is supposed to be either eliminated or captured in the ground.

Story continues below advertisement

Citing the potential influence of “climate activists” on a panel set up to tell the government, the Conservatives have moved to quash the bill.

Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson recently wrote to two New Democrat MPs, saying he’s prepared to amend the legislation to address some of their party’s concerns if it gets to committee.

The NDP has been asking the Liberals to set a 2025 milestone target to deal with what it says is a lack of accountability on reducing emissions over the next decade.

“2030 is around the corner and this is the most important decade,” NDP MP Taylor Bachrach said Tuesday.

Wilkinson said in his letter he supports improved accountability and including Canada’s newly announced goal of slashing greenhouse gas pollution between 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels over the next nine years.

The previous goal had been 30 per cent under Paris Agreement, but the Liberals say under existing measures it can get to 36 per cent.

Wilkinson says the government’s proposal for better short-term accountability includes added progress reports in 2023 and 2025, on top of one set for 2027.

Story continues below advertisement

“Let me clear, though: I support enhanced interim accountability to ensure we meet our 2030 target – not another target-setting exercise for a date that would be only two-and-a-half years after Bill C-12 would potentially come into force,” reads the letter.

“The additional requirements could include estimates of projected greenhouse gas emissions over time as well as projected reductions resulting from measures taken. This will ensure Canadians have a clear and publicly available picture of Canada’s overall trajectory toward meeting our enhanced 2030 target,” it reads.

But Bachrach said there’s an important difference between a progress report and setting a halfway target to reaching that goal.

“One describes where we are and the other one describes where we need to be,” he said.

“Without defining the actual track and without setting out milestones or checkpoints along the way it’s very hard to claim that we’re on track.”

The Liberal government also suggested amendments around the advisory body and sector-specific emissions goals.

Story continues below advertisement

If the House of Commons passes a bill at the second-reading stage, it heads to committee for further scrutiny by members of Parliament.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies