Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole speaks at an election campaign stop in Vancouver, on Sept. 5.

JENNIFER GAUTHIER/Reuters

On Aug. 15, the day Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau launched the federal election campaign, Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole’s chief strategist made a prediction.

“Once again, @erinotoole begins a campaign as the underdog,” Dan Robertson tweeted. “This isn’t the first time he’s been underestimated, but it will be the last.”

No one is underestimating Mr. O’Toole today, not least the Liberals. The two leaders and the two parties are running neck and neck in the polls. Either leader could be prime minister after Sept. 20.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian federal election 2021: Latest updates and essential reading ahead of Sept. 20 vote

Those of us who underestimated Mr. O’Toole failed to appreciate the intensity of his will to win – perhaps the single most important ingredient in the making of a successful politician.

That will to win reveals itself in several ways. Mr. O’Toole has lost 35 pounds over the past year and a half or so, mostly by running daily, which he says also helps to clear his mind.

Some people thought Mr. O’Toole would not even seek the Conservative leadership because his French was inadequate. But he has been working diligently to improve it. My colleague Campbell Clark described Mr. O’Toole’s French as “a little wooden, but serviceable” in last week’s TVA debate.

The Conservative Leader possesses two qualities his predecessors, Andrew Scheer and Stephen Harper, noticeably lacked. The first is a willingness – even eagerness – to engage with crowds. Mr. O’Toole is an extroverted leader who enjoys interacting with the public, a quality he shares with Mr. Trudeau.

The second is a tactical flexibility both previous leaders lacked. Mr. Harper sometimes got hung up on a principle that cost him politically, such as cutting arts funding prior to the 2008 election. Mr. Scheer simply could not, or would not, do whatever was necessary to put allegations of hidden agendas on abortion and LGBTQ rights to rest.

When Mr. O’Toole discovered that his pledge to repeal restrictions on certain firearms was hurting him in this election campaign, he quickly reversed himself. Flip-flops are bad, but declaring that a particular issue is a hill you are willing to die on, and then dying on it, is worse.

Political extroversion and tactical flexibility in the relentless pursuit of power makes Mr. O’Toole the most Liberal leader the Conservatives have ever had. I mean this as a compliment.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Trudeau, having underestimated his opponent just as Mr. Robertson predicted, is now furiously counterattacking. Forget about “Build Back Better” or “Choose Forward.” The Liberal campaign has devolved into a no-holds-barred effort to slag Mr. O’Toole. He is in thrall to the gun lobby, the Liberal war room asserts. He courts vaccine hesitant individuals, he would privatize health care, he would limit abortion rights.

The latest slur is the allegation he denies global warming, despite the Conservatives’ credible plan to fight climate change. “Can’t expect him to care about something he doesn’t believe exists,” Liberal candidate Patty Hajdu tweeted Tuesday. Now really.

History suggests Mr. O’Toole will lose this election. Ontario voters have a lot to say about who forms the federal government, and they like to kick the tires with leaders. Provincially, they handed Progressive Conservative Mike Harris (in 1990) and Liberal Dalton McGuinty (in 1999) defeats, before rewarding them with victories in the subsequent elections. They did the same to Mr. Harper in 2004. They may well do the same with Mr. O’Toole in 2021.

In the 2004 and 2019 elections, Liberals hauled out the hidden-agenda strategy when they found themselves on the ropes, and it worked. It may work again.

But Mr. O’Toole has silenced all reasonable doubts about his ability to lead the Conservative Party. And who knows? Mr. Trudeau is sufficiently unpopular, and the hidden-agenda trope so patently concocted, that voters might not buy the boogeyman argument this time, just as they failed to buy it in the 2006 election that made Mr. Harper prime minister.

Whatever happens, Dan Robertson was right. No one will ever underestimate Erin O’Toole again.

Story continues below advertisement

Follow the party leaders and where they stand on the issues this election campaign by signing up for our Morning or Evening Update newsletters.

For subscribers only: Get exclusive political news and analysis by signing up for the Politics Briefing.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies