Skip to main content

Security cameras peer over the shoulder of Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole as he speaks to the media in Vancouver on Sept. 5, 2021. O'Toole has faced days of questions about his party's gun policy after repeatedly saying he would maintain a ban on "assault weapons," while remaining evasive about whether he was talking about a 1977 ban on fully automatic weapons or a more recent Liberal cabinet order.

Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press

Erin O’Toole said he won’t “prejudge” the outcome of a firearms classification review that a Conservative government would conduct if elected, leaving open the possibility that the federal government’s ban on some 1,500 assault-style weapons could be lifted.

For the fourth day on the campaign trail, Mr. O’Toole was pressed to explain his party’s position on the May, 2020, ban brought in by the Liberal government. It includes guns used in mass shootings in Canada such as those at Montreal’s Dawson College and École Polytechnique and in Moncton.

Since the Conservative Leader’s appearance in the first leaders’ debate on Thursday, his message to voters has shifted considerably. However, critics and supporters say his actual policy has not.

Story continues below advertisement

The party’s platform first said the Conservatives would repeal the May, 2020, ban and conduct a review of how firearms are classified. At the TVA French debate in Montreal last week, Mr. O’Toole disputed a charge from Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau that the Conservatives would “bring back assault weapons.”

O’Toole risks electoral gains with stance on gun control

O’Toole breaks with election platform, pledges status quo on firearm bans

Gun control advocates unimpressed with Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole’s policy change on Liberal gun ban

At the time, Mr. O’Toole said he would “maintain a ban on assault weapons,” but the next day, gun lobby groups said he was referring to a 1977 ban on fully automatic guns rather than those banned in 2020.

The party first stood by its position, but then on Sunday, Mr. O’Toole announced a Conservative government would maintain the 2020 restrictions “full stop.” He added: “We will then have an independent review – public – of our classification system.”

He did not clarify whether the guns that are currently banned in Canada would change after that review. Canada classifies firearms under three areas: prohibited, restricted and non-restricted.

“I’m not going to prejudge that process because I should not be running that process,” Mr. O’Toole said on Monday. The party did not say who would be in charge of that panel.

Despite his change in position, the Conservative platform still says the 2020 order-in-council, which brought in the ban, would be repealed. A footnote added on Monday says, “all firearms that are currently banned will remain banned.” Asked how the two can both be true, party spokesperson Mathew Clancy said the original policy was kept “for the sake of openness and transparency,” and that the footnote is there to “clarify the position as Mr. O’Toole stated.”

The changing message from the Conservatives shows the party contending with the promises it made to gun owners with the values of voters in key swing ridings, said A.J. Somerset, who wrote a book on gun culture called Arms: The Culture and Credo of the Gun.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s a flip-flop and it’s not a flip-flop. There’s a lot of word games,” Mr. Somerset said. “I think that promise is still there and the signal to gun owners is you’re not going to get what you want as fast as you were hoping.”

National Firearms Association executive vice-president Blair Hagen had a similar take on Monday. He said his group shares many members with the Conservative Party and he does not believe Mr. O’Toole has reversed his position.

“Under a Conservative government, we are expecting the repeal of the May, 2020, OIC will take place,” Mr. Hagen said.

Mr. Clancy said the Conservatives notified the association of Mr. O’Toole’s Sunday comments.

On the weekend, Conservative candidate Rob Morrison said his party has not changed from its original position. In response on Monday, Mr. O’Toole said: “I am the leader and we will have an approach focused on public safety, focused on maintaining restrictions in place and having a review of our classification system that removes the politics from this.”

The Conservative Leader said gun crime had gone up under the Liberal government. In July, Statistics Canada released a report that found the rate of Criminal Code firearm offences went up for a sixth consecutive year. A 2019 Globe and Mail investigation found while semi-automatic rifles have been used in some of Canada’s most notorious mass shootings, their overall prevalence in Canadian homicides is nominal.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network and Danforth Families for Safe Communities in a joint statement on Monday said they “are further alarmed” by Mr. O’Toole’s latest comments.

They also said the Conservative platform directly states gun manufacturers and gun owners will be included in the review, that same document didn’t explicitly name other groups including survivors, scientists or physicians.

At a campaign stop in Welland, Ont., on Monday, the Liberal Leader said Mr. O’Toole is trying to please people on both sides of the debate. “He’ll say anything to try and get elected,” Mr. Trudeau said.

In nearby Hamilton, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said his party would implement a mandatory buyback program to enforce the 2020 ban. He criticized the Liberals for breaking their 2019 election promise on that measure. The Liberals are now promising in this campaign to make the buyback program mandatory.

Follow the party leaders and where they stand on the issues this election campaign by signing up for our Morning or Evening Update newsletters.

For subscribers only: Get exclusive political news and analysis by signing up for the Politics Briefing.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies