Skip to main content

Today, readers are responding to an exclusive Globe interview with Senator Mark Warner, the Democratic vice-chair of the U.S. Senate intelligence committee, in which he urges Canada to set aside any ill feelings toward President Donald Trump and join the United States in blacklisting China’s Huawei Technologies from next-generation wireless networks.

Senator Mark Warner, seen here on Capitol Hill, told The Globe and Mail in an exclusive interview that he’s concerned Western governments are not paying sufficient heed to Washington’s warnings on Huawei.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Canada allan1:

We should not need to be encouraged. Canada should be [banning Huawei] anyway. Our lack of response to China sickens me. This country needs leadership.

Jangm:

Story continues below advertisement

Good allies have each other's backs. The U.S., under Trump, has not been a good ally. Canada must make the decision based on facts. Not a political ploy foisted on us, like Meng.

WakeUpCanada911:

This should be a no brainer. There is no room here for nuanced debate. Even the suggestion that we should at least consider risking or trading off personal privacy, surveillance by predatory political and economic interests, and freedom of expression without fear of retaliation for some kind of potential economic benefits is extremely naive. Having lived in several East and South East Asian communist countries over much of the past 25 years, I can write with full confidence that the State (the Party) owns and/or controls everything of significance within their borders, either directly or indirectly. Huawei is definitely significant. Just say no.

Alpha4 in response:

What you're suggesting is we stand up to the bully in the East and submit to the one to the South. When you talk about "predatory political and economic interests", you're describing the U.S. perfectly.

THE GLOB:

I think we are better off having multiple vendors involved. That way our telecom networks will not be tied to a single vendor. Sure, huawei might have risks. Limit their gear to a small segment on non-sensitive areas of the network. Where we need to be really careful is with smartphones. Every smart hacker knows that the best and easiest way to break into a network is at the endpoints. That is where the encryption packing and unpacking gets done. You will expend less effort into capturing data unencrypted at the endpoint than trying to crack an encrypted stream of data.

Dunrob:

[Senator Mark Warner is] another one on the pay list of U.S. manufacturers who cannot hope to achieve the progress that Huawei has within the next decades.

William Dynes:

On this decision, we should stick with our allies before we engage with communism. When has China ever done anything for Canada?

K2GMAN:

The Chinese government and Huawei cannot be trusted to act in the best interest of Canadians, as shown by recent Chinese tantrum diplomacy. Canada needs to ban Huawei 5G equipment as soon as possible. It is clearly not worth the risk to allow potential Chinese espionage infestation of critical communications infrastructure.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter.

Story continues below advertisement

From the Comments is designed to highlight interesting and thoughtful contributions from our readers. Some comments have been edited for clarity. Everyone can read the comments but only subscribers will be able to contribute. Thank you to everyone furthering debate across our site.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter