Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

NDP MP Charlie Angus rises during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on June 16.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

A New Democrat MP’s request for documents related to a new regulator that will handle child pornography and exploitive material could take over half a decade for the government to process.

In a letter responding to NDP ethics critic Charlie Angus’s access-to-information request, the Justice Department said it will take more than six years to provide correspondence and briefings from a three-month period between December and March related to the regulator.

The Liberal government announced in April it would introduce legislation to create a regulator that will ensure online platforms remove harmful content, including depictions of children and intimate images that are shared without consent.

Story continues below advertisement

Conservative and New Democrat MPs have questioned why a regulatory authority is needed to crack down on exploitive content when the Criminal Code already bars child pornography and the knowing distribution of illicit images.

Angus said the lack of details or timelines for the regulator prompted his request. He called the 75-month waiting period “ridiculous.”

Civil servants in charge of information access in each department handle requests for documents, rather than elected politicians.

“But we’ve seen many times the political pressures on certain key files to slow down the release of those documents,” Angus said in an interview.

The Justice Department said that time frames for processing requests are based on the estimated number of records and that interim release of documents is possible in high-volume cases.

“This complex work is undertaken by departmental officials in a non-partisan manner that respects access to information laws and policies,” department spokesman Ian McLeod said in an e-mail.

He noted requesters have the right to file a complaint with the information commissioner, which Angus did on July 13.

Story continues below advertisement

James L. Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Ryerson University, said he was “staggered by this response” of a six-year timeline.

“It’s outrageous. It really shows how badly broken our access to information system is in Canada.”

Bureaucrats overseeing access to information and privacy (ATIP) are typically helpful, Turk said.

“Other times the ATIP officers act as if they’re guardians of Fort Knox.”

The complaint process can take months due to lack of proper funding, he said, adding that multiple governments have failed to overhaul ATIP laws and achieve the transparency essential to a liberal democracy.

“You can’t have a vibrant democratic society unless you have an informed citizenry. And access-to-information legislation is one of the things that helps ensure that,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

“At the end of the day, it’s their information and their data.”

Amendments to the Access to Information Act by the Liberal government in 2019 gave the information commissioner new powers to order the release of documents and view files that had previously been beyond the watchdog’s scope. Bill C-58 marked the first major update to the legislation since it came into force in 1983.

“But the changes were mostly cosmetic,” Turk said, arguing that exemptions can be interpreted too broadly under the act.

The new regime does not compel the government to document its affairs, he said.

“So if it wants to avoid being transparent, it doesn’t put its decisions in writing.”

The Treasury Board launched a review of the legislation in June 2020, with a focus on boosting “pro-active publication” and reducing delays, said spokeswoman Genevieve Sicard.

Story continues below advertisement

“The government of Canada is committed to ensuring that access to information supports the openness, transparency and accountability of Canadian democratic institutions,” she said in an e-mail.

A report with recommendations is due by Jan. 31, following the wrap-up of virtual workshops that have so far featured experts, academics and members of the public, she said.

Wesley Wark, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, dubbed the review a “public relations exercise.”

He is calling for a green paper – a consultation document with policy proposals – to guide the review process and draw on previous calls for change.

Currently, the Access to Information Act allows the government to withhold information “obtained in confidence,” deemed harmful to conducting international affairs or tied to defence and security. Cabinet documents are also off limits.

Information commissioner Caroline Maynard drew attention to the latter, among other legislative shortcomings, in a January report. Section 69 of the act excludes cabinet confidences from records available to the public.

Story continues below advertisement

The federal government’s use of that exemption increased 49 per cent between 2014-15 and 2018-19, according to figures from the commissioner’s office.

Canada has fallen behind countries such as the United Kingdom, United States and Finland in records access, Wark said.

“The system is broken. That’s not the fault of the current Liberal government; it goes back decades,” he said, citing a huge cultural problem and calling for immediate action.

Wark called the six-year timeline “absurd,” “ridiculous” and an “abuse of the intent and spirit” of access to information laws.

After asking the Justice Department about the delay, it reached out to Charlie Angus to suggest “options” for reducing the wait.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies