Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault says government rules are coming that will require social-media companies to take down illegal or hateful content.

On Wednesday, Mr. Guilbeault welcomed federally funded reports from the Public Policy Forum and the Canadian Race Relations Foundation that urge the government to act because they say internet giants like Google and Facebook are not doing enough to review and remove dangerous content on their platforms.

“Canadians are now asking their government to hold social media companies accountable for the content that appears on their platforms,” Mr. Guilbeault said in a statement provided by his office. “This is exactly what we intend to do by introducing new regulations that will require online platforms to remove illegal and hateful content before they cause more harm and damage.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Public Policy Forum (PPF), an independent policy organization that received Canadian Heritage funding to produce its report, called this week for the creation of a powerful federal regulator to oversee how platform companies moderate content on their sites. The forum also recommended creating an e-tribunal to which Canadians can bring concerns over individual social-media posts.

Also this week, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, a federal Crown corporation, released a survey it commissioned from Abacus Data showing 80 per cent support for requiring social-media companies to remove racist or hateful content within 24 hours of it being identified. The survey also found that racialized groups are three times more likely to experience racism online than non-racialized Canadians.

The survey of 2,000 Canadian residents was conducted from Jan. 15 to Jan. 18. It was done online with a representative sample of Canadian adults. Because it was not a random survey, a margin of error could not be calculated.

Mohammed Hashim, executive director of the Canadian Race Relations Foundation, said social-media companies can’t be trusted to protect Canadians from online harassment, racism and threats.

“This is an important moment where there needs to be rebalancing of the online space,” he said in an interview. “We’ve normalized seeing hate online, and what scares me is that that’s the environment we’re bringing our kids into as they grow up and become who they are.”

Cara Zwibel, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s fundamental-freedoms program, said she is not opposed to an independent tribunal that resolves disputes over online content, but noted the government has not been clear exactly what it is proposing. If new rules go beyond existing legal definitions of hate speech or attempt to define misinformation, she said that will raise freedom-of-speech concerns.

“The devil really will be in the details,” she said. ”I’m nervous at the prospect of the government deciding on what is true – probably just as nervous as I am about social-media platforms deciding what is true. So I think we need to be really careful about regulation that tries to deal with that problem.”

Story continues below advertisement

Conservative MP Alain Rayes said in an e-mail that he appreciated the thoroughness of the PPF report and he’s consulting with interested groups.

“We are waiting impatiently for the government to table a bill so that we can start working on this file,” he said. “The government needs to find the right balance between regulation and preserving freedom of expression, which is so important in our democracy.”

NDP MP Charlie Angus welcomed the PPF’s suggestion that a regulator scrutinize how companies use algorithms to prioritize online content.

“The algorithms are fanning extremism,” he said. “Extremist content has been continually favoured by YouTube and Facebook, and I think it’s led to real-world problems.”

Mr. Guilbeault and three Facebook Canada officials are scheduled to appear on Friday before the House of Commons Committee on Canadian Heritage on the topic of “relations between Facebook and the federal government.”

One of the three officials, Kevin Chan, Facebook Canada’s global director and head of public policy, issued a statement on Wednesday in response to the PPF report’s call for a new federal social-media regulator.

Story continues below advertisement

“We have community standards that govern what is and isn’t allowed on our platform, and in most cases, those standards go well beyond what’s required by law. We agree that regulators should make clear rules for the internet so private companies aren’t making these decisions on their own. We stand ready to collaborate on these complex issues,” he said.

Google Canada and Twitter Canada issued similar statements in response to the PPF report and pledged to co-operate with the Canadian government on developing any new guidelines for social media.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies