Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

An Iranian man who resides in Montreal has been charged in the United States for allegedly exporting lab equipment to Iran of the kind that can be used in nuclear-weapons development.

Reza Sarhangpour Kafrani, a.k.a. Reza Sarhang, 46, was indicted by a grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and charged with two counts of violations of the U.S. International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), one count of conspiracy, six counts of money laundering and one count of causing a failure to submit export information.

Mr. Kafrani will be arraigned on the charges on a date to be determined by the court, the U.S. Justice Department said in a press release.

Story continues below advertisement

Also charged was Seyed Reza Mirnezami, a dual citizen of both Canada and Iran who lived in Iran and is affiliated with Tehran’s Sharif University of Technology, says the court filing, dated July 30.

The indictment of the pair is the product of years of investigation by U.S. and Canadian authorities including intelligence-gathering efforts by Canada Border Services Agency.

According to court documents, over the course of several months in 2016, Mr. Kafrani and Mr. Mirnezami purchased three mass spectrometers and other gear for US$110,739 from a U.S. company and had the goods shipped to Canada. Upon arrival, they used a Canadian-based shipping company to re-export the equipment to the United Arab Emirates. From there, they hired a UAE-based company to ship the items to Iran.

None of the allegations have been proven in court.

The U.S., Canada and many other Western countries restrict the export to Iran of equipment that can be used to develop nuclear weapons.

“Mass spectrometers can be used to monitor the performance of uranium enrichment,” Channing Phillips, the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, wrote in the indictment. “In particular they allow those enriching uranium to determine the level of enrichment, which is an essential part of enriching uranium for nuclear power and weaponization efforts.”

The alleged shipments occurred after the 2015 deal struck by former U.S. president Barack Obama and other foreign leaders to lift sanctions on Iran imposed by the U.S., European Union and United Nations in return for Tehran agreeing to long-term curbs on a nuclear program that the West has suspected was aimed at creating a nuclear bomb.

Story continues below advertisement

Former president Donald Trump later withdrew the U.S. from the deal and, in early July, the UN’s atomic watchdog said Iran has begun the process of producing enriched uranium metal.

At one point in 2015, the indictment says, Mr. Mirnezami contacted the Canadian government about exporting lab equipment to Iran. The indictment does not provide much detail but says the Canadian government “responded, advising [Mr.] Mirnezami about … sanctions against Iran.”

The court filing suggests the men were aware of the heavy restrictions on exports to Iran. It says in late 2015 one of them e-mailed the other a link to a news report about “Montreal men accused of illegally exporting railway equipment to Iran” along with a note in Persian stating “This is dangerous! We have to talk.”

They also allegedly negotiated by e-mail with a U.S. company, not identified in the indictment, to purchase mass spectrometry instruments that they said would be exported to Canada. At one point, the indictment says, Mr. Kafrani asked the company representative if associated installation costs would be the same for the Middle East. The company official warned them off, saying “You know there are sanctions in place for Iran. I thought this equipment was going to Montreal … Thanks for wasting my time.”

According to the indictment, the men then tried to obtain export licences from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to legally export the lab equipment to Iran, but these licences were never granted.

The conduct alleged by the U.S. would also mean that the men violated Canada’s export-control laws.

Story continues below advertisement

It’s not the first time that the U.S. has prosecuted cases with Canadian ties and alleged illegal exports to Iran.

Toronto trade lawyer Cyndee Todgham Cherniak said the U.S. often takes the lead on prosecuting export violations with Canadian connections because American authorities have greater means to pursue suspects.

“We often cede it to the Americans because the Canadian government hasn’t allocated the resources to pursue export-control violators,” she said. “On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Justice is fully funded and they are more than happy to pursue nationals of other jurisdictions.”

She said some would-be export lawbreakers gamble on the fact that small or medium-sized Canadian businesses may not be familiar with export law.

The U.S charges of conspiracy and failing to submit export information carry a statutory maximum of five years in prison. Violations of the IEEPA and money-laundering charges carry a statutory maximum of 20 years in prison.

With reports from Reuters

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies