Skip to main content

Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould rises during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, June 4, 2018.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

The federal Liberal government will raise the maximum amounts political parties can spend in the run-up to an election after striking a deal with the Opposition Conservatives to allow the government’s election bill to move ahead.

The bill’s proposed spending limits during what will be called the “pre-election” period were a major concern of the Conservatives, who generally lead the way when it comes to fundraising and would be in a position to outspend their competitors in the weeks before an election campaign.

The Conservatives had attacked the pre-election spending limit as a blatant attempt by the Liberals to tilt the electoral rules in their favour, by limiting the ability of opposition parties to advertise during a period when the governing party continues to have access to government-funded travel and other avenues for self-promotion.

Story continues below advertisement

Under the agreement between Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould and her Conservative Party critic, Stephanie Kusie, the pre-election spending limit would change from $1.5-million to $2-million.

“I’m just really glad that the bill is moving forward,” Ms. Gould said in an interview. “This is how Parliament is supposed to work.”

The next federal election is scheduled for October, 2019, but the Conservative Party is already running ads to promote party leader Andrew Scheer.

Canada’s fixed date election laws schedule a vote for the third Monday in October every four years, though the government retains the power to call an early election. Bill C-76 limits the length of an election campaign to a 50-day maximum and the pre-election period begins on June 30, meaning the pre-election rules roughly cover the months of July and August in the run-up to a fall election.

Ms. Kusie praised the arrangement after it was formally read into the record and approved Thursday by the procedure and house affairs committee, which has now agreed to wrap up its review of more than 300 amendments and return the bill to the House of Commons by Oct. 19.

In an interview, Ms. Kusie said the deal to end the filibuster and raise the pre-election spending limit was the result of direct and “sincere” negotiations between her and Ms. Gould, the minister responsible for the bill.

“I don’t think it’s ideal, but it is an improvement and a step forward in terms of the bill itself,” she said, predicting the changes should now move ahead in time for the 2019 election campaign.

Story continues below advertisement

The deal caught the NDP by surprise. NDP MP Nathan Cullen said he only learned of the Liberals’ arrangement with the Conservatives in the hallway five minutes before Thursday’s meeting.

He told the committee that the agreement reminded him of the saying that laws are like sausages, “it’s better not to see them being made, to retain respect for sausages – and laws.”

Mr. Cullen told MPs he would support the deal and expressed hope the other parties would in turn be open to supporting NDP amendments, particularly a proposal that would subject federal political parties to privacy laws. The Chief Electoral Officer and the federal Privacy Commissioner have told the committee they would support such a change, but the minister has not committed to adopt those recommendations.

“Perhaps there’s something that we can do, although maybe not as directly in this legislation,” Ms. Gould said. “I need to look deeper at the amendments, but I think it’s something that we need to study with more depth.”

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter