Skip to main content

Premier Pallister speaks to reporters after meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, not shown, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, on Friday, Nov. 8, 2019.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister stepped up his criticism of Quebec’s secularism law Thursday and said his government may intervene in a future court battle over it.

In his annual state of the province speech to the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Pallister said Quebec’s ban on religious symbols being worn by some public servants is hurting Canada’s reputation on the international stage.

He told the crowd of about 1,300 that the law must be fought in the same spirit as the way Canadian soldiers fought in world wars.

Story continues below advertisement

“When our reputation globally is threatened by such initiatives, we must stand up,” Mr. Pallister said.

“And Manitobans always have – at Vimy Ridge, on the beach at Normandy, in the deserts of Afghanistan and, yes, in the legislature and in the House of Commons … we do not stand back when other people’s rights are threatened.”

Court challenges have already been filed in Quebec to try to overturn the ban on religious symbols. The Quebec Court of Appeal rejected a request Thursday by some of the law’s opponents to suspend parts of it until a full court hearing can be held.

After his speech, Mr. Pallister said Manitoba will probably seek intervener status if the case ends up in the Supreme Court of Canada, but other premiers will be consulted first.

“It’s very likely, but we’ll wait and see what our partners are doing as we’re trying to co-ordinate efforts in respect of gathering support to oppose this piece of misguided legislation,” he said.

Opposition NDP Leader Wab Kinew said he would support Manitoba intervening.

“The state, in the province of Quebec, is suppressing people’s rights,” Mr. Kinew said in French.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Pallister has long been a vocal critic of the Quebec law. The Manitoba government took out newspaper and digital advertisements last month to invite Quebec civil servants to move to Manitoba if they are concerned about the Quebec ban.

Quebec Premier Francois Legault has defended the legislation as a legitimate way to ensure secularism in the public sector.

Mr. Pallister’s opposition to the law has promoted some speculation that he might leave office to run federally. He ruled that out Thursday, saying he was just re-elected in September and plans to stay on at least until the next election in 2023.

“I plan on completing my term and if the people will have me thereafter, I’m excited to embrace the challenges.”

Mr. Pallister spent most of his speech touting his Progressive Conservative government’s actions to control spending and bring down annual deficits.

The province is on track toward a balanced budget in two years, he said, despite some challenges including roughly $1 billion in potential legal costs stemming from a variety of lawsuits filed against the government and public bodies such as Manitoba Hydro.

Story continues below advertisement

“There will be bills. Not just legal bills for the conduct of the court case (but) settlements required for many of these cases as well.”

The province faces a lawsuit from the Manitoba Metis Federation over a cancelled benefits agreement regarding hydroelectric development. It is also being sued by the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs over the former NDP government’s refusal to allow a First Nations casino in Winnipeg.

There are other legal actions as well, Mr. Pallister said.

“I shouldn’t probably be referring to specific examples. There are too many.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies