Skip to main content

Conservative Party Leader Andrew Scheer leaves a voting station at Our Lady of Peace Parish on Election Day in Regina, on Oct. 21, 2019. On Sunday a Conservative source said Mr. Scheer believes he followed party rules with the use of Conservative Fund donations for some of his children's private-school tuition.

Michael Bell/The Canadian Press

A member of the Conservative Party’s fundraising arm says he doesn’t believe the rules were followed when the party approved the use of donations to cover the private-school tuition fees of some of Leader Andrew Scheer’s children.

Louis Leger is the first member of the seven-person Conservative Fund to speak publicly since Mr. Scheer resigned and the fund dismissed executive director Dustin van Vugt last week. The use of party funds for the private Catholic school tuition fees of four of Mr. Scheer’s five children cuts to the core of the party’s anti-elite brand and has sparked a firestorm of debate within the party.

When asked whether he agreed that proper protocols were followed, Mr. Leger said simply, “No.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Conservative Fund is the not-for-profit organization that raises and spends money to fund the party.

Last week, Mr. van Vugt defended the use of party money for tuition, saying in a statement that "all proper procedures were followed and signed off on by the appropriate people.”

Mr. Scheer resigned as leader Thursday, a day after The Globe and Mail asked his office to verify whether the party was paying the tuition fees. He has not spoken publicly to any journalists since his resignation and has not issued any statements about the tuition fees.

On Sunday, a Conservative source said Mr. Scheer believes he followed party rules and was under the impression others involved in the payment had as well. The Globe is not naming the source so they can discuss internal party matters.

Mr. Leger, who is also the chief of staff to New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs, was in Ottawa for the meeting between Mr. Higgs and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Monday morning. Speaking with The Globe outside the Prime Minister’s Office, Mr. Leger said he didn’t know that party funds were being used for private-school tuition. Mr. Scheer receives a salary of more than $260,000 a year as Opposition leader, and his housing in Ottawa is paid for by taxpayers.

Mr. Leger said the chair of the fund, former senator Irving Gerstein, also didn’t know about the payments. Several sources have told The Globe that Mr. Gerstein signed off on paying the difference in schooling costs between Regina, where Mr. Scheer’s riding is located, and Ottawa.

Mr. Leger said he was in a meeting that included Mr. Gerstein, Mr. Scheer and Mr. van Vugt and that the tuition costs were not discussed.

Story continues below advertisement

“I was there as well," Mr. Leger said. “There was no discussion of private school funding.”

Asked if it’s possible there was another meeting with Mr. Scheer and the Conservative Fund, Mr. Leger said, “No.”

Mr. Scheer’s spokesperson, Simon Jefferies, did not provide a response to Mr. Leger’s comments and instead pointed The Globe to Mr. van Vugt’s statement from last week.

The Conservative Party has not responded to repeated requests for comments since The Globe reported Friday that Mr. van Vugt had been let go. Mr. Gerstein has also not replied to requests for comment.

Mr. Leger declined to give any reason for Mr. van Vugt’s dismissal, saying only: “He was asked for his resignation, but he wasn’t fired.”

The internal dispute comes as leadership contenders start to organize behind the scenes. No high profile people have officially entered the race, but the list of Conservatives who haven’t ruled it out is growing. Asked Monday if he will run for leader, Ottawa-area Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre wouldn’t rule it out, saying its “far too early” to decide. The party’s National Council has three meetings scheduled this week to discuss the formation and membership of the party’s leadership committee.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies