Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A physically distanced classroom at Kensington Community School amidst the COVID-19 pandemic on Sept. 1, 2020.

Carlos Osorio/The Canadian Press

Most Canadians support introducing mandatory curriculums that would ensure teachers educate their students about sex trafficking in schools, a new Nanos Research survey shows.

The Globe and Mail reported in February that no province or territory mandates teaching about sex trafficking, even though perpetrators often target students in schools. Organizations that work with victims and survivors say students should learn the signs and know how to get help.

Forty-nine per cent of Canadians surveyed by Nanos Research said they support mandatory education in schools on the topic of sex trafficking, and 36 per cent said they somewhat support it. Seven per cent said they somewhat oppose the idea, and 5 per cent said they oppose it. Four per cent said they are unsure.

Story continues below advertisement

The survey, which was commissioned by The Globe, also found that most Canadians support mandatory education on the topic for younger students – in grades 7 and 8. Forty-seven per cent of respondents said they support it for children in those grades, while 35 per cent somewhat support it. Eight per cent said they somewhat oppose the idea, and 6 per cent said they oppose it. Three per cent said they are unsure.

The Globe previously surveyed all provinces and territories to better understand what students learn about the issue in school. Most said their curriculums do not specifically name “sex trafficking” as an issue to be addressed, and no province guarantees through legislation that the topic is covered. However, for the most part, they do ensure that students learn the difference between healthy relationships and exploitation.

Ontario goes a step further because it includes the words “sex trafficking” in its curriculums, with the phrase first appearing in the grades 1-8 health and physical-education curriculum in a 2019 update. It had been part of the grades 9-12 social sciences and humanities curriculum since 2013.

However, apart from naming the crime, it does not ensure that students learn about it in school. Ontario’s curriculum includes exercises in grades 7 and 8 that deal with sex trafficking, but teachers are not obligated to use them.

Megan Walker, executive director of the London Abused Women’s Centre, said she is not surprised to hear Canadians support mandatory education on the topic. She said her organization has consistently advocated for it for students in grades 1 through 12.

“The Ford government has made a significant commitment to address sexual exploitation through increased funding, core funding, public awareness and legislation. The area missing is a mandatory curriculum starting in the early years,” she said.

Ontario has also provided funding to an organization called White Ribbon to develop resources and lesson plans on the topic. But students are still not required to use those resources.

Story continues below advertisement

In Nova Scotia, Progressive Conservative MLA Karla MacFarlane introduced a private member’s bill in 2019 that proposed making lessons about sex trafficking mandatory for students in grades 7 to 9. The bill died when the legislature was prorogued last year, but she reintroduced it Tuesday.

“We need something that is mandatory and that we know for sure that every child in the province of Nova Scotia is receiving the same information,” she said previously in an interview.

The Nanos Research survey also found that 88 per cent of Canadians were aware that sex trafficking is happening in Canada. Eight per cent said they were not aware, and four per cent said they were unsure.

It found that awareness is higher among residents of Atlantic Canada, with 93 per cent saying they were aware of the crime, and lower among residents of Quebec, where 79 per cent said they were aware of it.

Nanos Research randomly surveyed 1,007 Canadians 18 or older, and participants were recruited by live agents via phone – both landline and cell – and in a survey administered online. The margin of error for the survey is 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies