Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A parliamentary committee is threatening to escalate a months-long dispute with the Public Health Agency of Canada after the organization’s president repeatedly refused to disclose why two scientists were fired from Canada’s highest-security infectious-disease lab earlier this year

Iain Stewart, the head of PHAC, which has taken a leading role in the fight against COVID-19, has repeatedly declined to divulge to the House of Commons special committee on Canada-China relations why Xiangguo Qiu and her husband, Keding Cheng, were fired in January. Their security clearances were also revoked.

Back in July, 2019, the pair were escorted from the Winnipeg National Microbiology Laboratory, a Level 4 facility equipped to handle some of the world’s deadliest diseases. Four months earlier, the Winnipeg lab shipped Ebola and Henipah viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Story continues below advertisement

On Monday, members of the Canada-China committee adopted a motion demanding within 10 days that unredacted copies of all PHAC records on the matter be turned over to the House law clerk, who would first review them. Under their proposal, the committee would then meet in secret to determine what could then be released publicly.

MPs also voted to send the matter to the Commons should the Public Health Agency fail to deliver what they are seeking. The Commons would then have the opportunity to put its full weight behind a disclosure order.

When the committee last ordered PHAC to turn over documents related to the pair’s dismissal, and to the transfer of these viruses, the agency heavily censored the records before relinquishing them. PHAC says the firing of the two staff is unrelated to the virus transfer to Wuhan.

Mr. Stewart told MPs Monday that the transfer was part of an effort by Canada to “foster global collaboration.”

Conservative foreign-affairs critic Michael Chong told Mr. Stewart that he believes Canadian law gives Members of Parliament the authority to compel the production of information, even that of a personal nature.

Garnett Genuis, Conservative human-rights critic, recalled a 2010 ruling by former Commons speaker Peter Milliken that found the Harper government had breached parliamentary privilege by refusing to produce uncensored documents related to the treatment of Afghan detainees. The documents were eventually shared with a select group of parliamentarians.

PHAC’s Mr. Stewart said he believes he is forbidden from divulging records that would reveal “personal information, investigations or security matters.” He told MPs that he was not being unco-operative but was complying with legal advice he had been given. “We’re bound by law to keep confidential information confidential.”

Story continues below advertisement

He said the RCMP are investigating this matter and questions should be directed to the Mounties.

Bloc Québécois foreign-affairs critic Stéphane Bergeron told Mr. Stewart that he was ignoring the will of parliamentarians.

“You have not given us unredacted documents and nor have you answered the fundamental questions we have been putting forward … from the very outset. What leads you to think that you, PHAC, is authorized to not respond to requests from parliamentarians?”

Robert Oliphant, the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, took pains to distance the subject in dispute from the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. The virus was first detected in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

“This has nothing to do with coronavirus,” Mr. Oliphant told the committee.

He also cautioned the Public Health Agency to review the legal advice it is getting.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think you need a second opinion. I think the Justice Department is not giving you the best advice,” he said.

Dr. Qiu was head of the Vaccine Development and Antiviral Therapies section in the Special Pathogens program at the Winnipeg lab.

In March, Mr. Stewart linked the departure of the scientists to a “number of review processes” initiated by PHAC in 2018, “relating to possible breaches of security protocols” at the National Microbiology Laboratory.

With reports from The Canadian Press

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies