Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Cindy Blackstock, Executive Director of First Nations Child and Family Caring Society holds a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Sept. 15, 2016.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

There has been no indication that Canada will withdraw its application for judicial review of two orders from a human-rights tribunal despite a motion that passed in the House of Commons on the matter on Monday, First Nations child advocate Cindy Blackstock says.

Ms. Blackstock told The Globe and Mail that her organization, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada, is preparing for hearings that will be held in Federal Court beginning Monday.

“We will go to court and the children will win,” she said. “And when they do, Canadians will win, too.”

Story continues below advertisement

An NDP motion passed in the House of Commons on Monday with 271 MPs from all political parties voting in favour, including several Liberal MPs, and 0 against. The motion included calls for Ottawa to end legal actions against Canadian Human Rights Tribunal orders on discrimination of Indigenous children.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and members of his cabinet abstained from the vote on the motion. Its passage is seen as an expression of the House but is non-binding, meaning the government cannot be forced to take action. The Liberal government has faced increased political pressure on supports offered for First Nations children after remains of children were reported on the site of B.C.’s former Kamloops Indian Residential School.

Mr. Trudeau said Tuesday that his government has been “very clear that kids or now adults” who suffered harm at the hands of the child welfare system deserve compensation. He also noted the passage of legislation on the child welfare system and work to ensure Indigenous communities “stay in charge of and can protect, within their language and culture, kids who are at risk.”

NDP MP Charlie Angus said Tuesday the Liberal caucus did not stand with the Prime Minister on the motion Monday.

“This is supposed to be his most important relationship and he skipped the vote,” Mr. Angus said. “I don’t think that that gives him a free pass, then, to go back to court to continue to fight the children. Parliament has spoken.”

Ottawa has filed applications in Federal Court for judicial review of two orders from the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. The body was created by Parliament in 1977 and legally decides whether a person or organization has engaged in a discriminatory practice as defined by the Canadian Human Rights Act. The purpose of the act is to protect individuals from discrimination and states all Canadians have the right to equality, equal opportunity, fair treatment and an environment free of discrimination.

In 2019, the tribunal found that the federal government willfully and recklessly discriminated against Indigenous children on reserve by failing to provide funding for child and family services. It also ordered Ottawa to provide up to $40,000 to First Nations children who were unnecessarily taken into care on or after Jan. 1, 2006, adding that its orders also cover parents or grandparents and children denied essential services.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa said in its legal application for judicial review that it did not oppose the general principle that compensation to First Nations individuals affected by a discriminatory funding model can be made in appropriate circumstances. But it said the government sees grounds for the application based on its belief the tribunal erred in its decision, including on the order of monetary compensation to First Nations children, parents and grandparents under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

A second order from the tribunal is related to Jordan’s Principle, which is designed to ensure First Nations children can access services and supports when they need them. It requires that children get access to services without delays caused by jurisdictional issues.

In 2020, the tribunal found that criteria for Jordan’s Principle could include a child who is registered or eligible to be registered under the Indian Act, a child who has a parent or guardian registered under the Indian Act, a child recognized by their community for the purposes of Jordan’s Principle and a child who is ordinarily a resident on reserve.

The government also said legal issues around the scope of the tribunal’s authority to issue these decisions are important and it was seeking guidance from the court.

A spokesperson for Indigenous Services Minister Marc Miller said in a statement that Ottawa has made “substantial progress” to respond to Canadian Human Rights Tribunal rulings.

“Our position in regards to the September, 2019, ruling is that the CHRT is overreaching their jurisdiction, and as a result, is unilaterally imposing a one-size-fits-all solution that hinders fair compensation,” said press-secretary Adrienne Vaupshas.

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies