Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Canada’s oil-producing provinces are calling for a shakeup in the federal equalization program after the latest figures revealed Quebec’s share of the $19.8-billion program will climb to two thirds as of next year.

Quebec gets the boost partly because the total cost of the program increases in line with economic growth, and Ontario will no longer qualify next year, leaving Quebec with a bigger share of the federal transfer program.

Next year’s $13.1-billion payment to Quebec – a $1.4-billion increase – will represent 66 per cent of the total equalization program, up from 61.9 per cent when Ontario was still on the receiving end of the federal program, which is intended to help poorer provinces provide similar levels of government services to those found in the rest of the country.

Story continues below advertisement

The federal Finance Department released the details of next year’s transfer amounts on Sunday evening, just before federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau played host to his provincial and territorial counterparts for dinner in Ottawa. Those meetings concluded on Monday afternoon.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe said the results of the current formula are “problematic” and underscore his call for change, which he will bring to the federal government.

“I don’t think equalization was ever a program that was meant to disburse 66 per cent of its proceeds to one province," he said.

Alberta Finance Minister Joe Ceci and Newfoundland and Labrador Finance Minister Tom Osborne also called for changes to the program on Monday.

While the results of the current equalization formula are not sitting well with those provinces, Quebec Premier François Legault caused further irritation last week when he defended Quebec’s opposition to the proposed Energy East pipeline that would bring Western Canadian crude through his province for refining in Atlantic Canada.

“I’m not ashamed at all of refusing dirty energy while we’re offering clean energy at a very competitive price,” Mr. Legault said.

When asked about the Quebec Premier’s remarks, Mr. Ceci told reporters: “He clearly doesn’t understand what is happening in the energy sector in Alberta at this point in time."

Story continues below advertisement

Saskatchewan’s Premier expressed a similar view.

“It’s that very energy product – which is sustainable, I might add, among the most sustainable in the world ... that is allowing for equalization in its current form to even exist," Mr. Moe said. “So as Canadians, if we support the sharing of our wealth, then we also need to support, together as Canadians, the advancement and the expansion of that wealth.”

In a budget bill this year, Mr. Morneau renewed for another five years the formula used to calculate how the funds are allocated, even though some provinces had been calling for significant changes. He stood by that decision on Monday as he responded to critics of the program.

“Moving on equalization may well be a possibility at the next time we renew it, which will be in four years," he said. Mr. Morneau said there are other programs to help provinces facing short-term challenges, and that equalization is not meant to address such situations. “The way it was intended to work was to ensure that Canadians who move from one province to another can get a roughly equal level of services in different parts of the country.”

The equalization program launched in 1957 and was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982. It is based on calculating a national average of fiscal capacity – essentially the ability of governments to raise revenue – and then compensating provinces that fall below that average.

However, the details of how that average is calculated are a subject of perpetual dispute, especially over whether to include revenue from natural resources and to what degree. Eligible provinces currently receive a payment based on either including 50 per cent of natural resource revenue or exempting them entirely, whichever produces a higher payment. The program had previously included all natural resources revenue. Alberta’s opposition leader, Jason Kenney, has called for natural resource revenue to be removed from the formula, and on Monday repeated his call for a provincial referendum on equalization.

Story continues below advertisement

Although the payments are an allocation of federal tax revenue, Alberta politicians have complained that their province contributes disproportionately to equalization.

A report this year by the Parliamentary Budget Officer that examined options for reform found that neither a full inclusion nor a full exemption of natural resource revenue would make Alberta an equalization recipient.

Quebec Finance Minister Éric Girard said he wants to bring Quebec’s fiscal capacity closer to the national average, which would reduce its share of equalization. However, he also said the fact that Albertans head to the polls in May could be injecting more emotion than necessary into the debate about Quebec’s share.

“The fact that Alberta will be in an election may be raising the volume on the equalization payments,” he said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies