Ontario Conservative MP Derek Sloan held to his leadership campaign slogan of being “Conservative without apology” and refused Wednesday to heed the demands of his fellow MPs to apologize for remarks questioning the loyalty of the country’s Chief Public Health Officer.
A motion had been put forward by other Conservative MPs from Ontario during a meeting Tuesday afternoon demanding he apologize or retract his comments. Otherwise, some of the very MPs he wants to lead were prepared to try and get him kicked out of caucus.
But just after the 6 p.m. ET deadline they’d set for him to apologize, Mr. Sloan issued a statement suggesting his remarks about Dr. Theresa Tam had been “deliberately” mischaracterized by the Liberals.
“I did not – and am not – questioning Dr. Tam’s loyalty to Canada,” he said.
Mr. Sloan drew national attention late last week when, in an e-mail to supporters, he criticized Dr. Tam’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, citing her work for and reliance upon data from the World Health Organization.
The WHO has come under scrutiny after it emerged that China, where the outbreak of the novel coronavirus began, potentially under-reported the extent of illness in that country, in turn tainting the guidance the UN’s health agency was providing to other countries.
Mr. Sloan asked whether Dr. Tam was working for “China or Canada.” She was born in Hong Kong, and that question prompted accusations that Mr. Sloan was being racist in his approach, as challenging someone’s loyalty is a historical racist trope.
In his statement, Mr. Sloan said he never once mentioned Dr. Tam’s race or sex in his remarks. He said it is obvious she is employed by Canada, not China, and while she is affiliated with the WHO, doesn’t work for that agency.
“I am sure that she wants what she thinks is best for Canada,” Mr. Sloan said.
But Mr. Sloan said she is relying on flawed data from the WHO and China, and while ultimately the Prime Minister is responsible for following her advice, she should still step down for making decisions that have cost Canadian lives.
Mr. Sloan was condemned across the political spectrum for his initial remarks, including by some of his fellow MPs who used social media last week to highlight their opposition.
Among them is Conservative Michael Chong, whose father immigrated to Canada from Hong Kong.
“While I might not agree with every decision she’s made, I’ve no doubt about her loyalty to Canada,” he wrote of Dr. Tam on social media. "We’re in this together and each one of us is doing their best.”
Mr. Chong did not bring forward the motion to kick Mr. Sloan out. But it is a piece of legislation that he brought forward several years ago that gives MPs the power to oust one of their own.
The Reform Act, which became law in 2015, gives MPs, and not a party leader, the ability to decide whether a fellow parliamentarian stays or goes.
To remove Mr. Sloan, written notice is required from 20 per cent of MPs requesting his membership be reviewed. Then, a majority must vote to expel him – a vote that must be held by secret ballot.
MPs have been meeting via video or teleconference since the COVID-19 pandemic shut down most in-person gatherings across the country. How a secret ballot could be conducted to oust Mr. Sloan is unclear.
Mr. Sloan is one of only two MPs in the running for leadership. The other is Ontario MP Erin O’Toole, who was also on the call. His campaign had no immediate comment on whether he backed the motion or not.
The other candidates are former MP and cabinet minister Peter MacKay, and Toronto lawyer Leslyn Lewis.
What support exists for Mr. Sloan’s leadership bid from within caucus is unclear. Mr. MacKay leads in endorsements from current MPs, and Mr. O’Toole and Dr. Lewis also have some declared supporters among elected Conservatives.
Mr. Sloan and Dr. Lewis, however, do both have the backing of the influential socially conservative group Campaign Life Coalition.
The organization circulated an e-mail to its membership Wednesday asking for their help to “save” Mr. Sloan. They said current leader Andrew Scheer’s refusal to publicly back him, and the fact that other potential leadership candidates were disqualified for controversial comments, does not bode well.
“We cannot allow the party establishment swamp to eliminate a third, socially conservative leadership candidate,” the group wrote in an e-mail.
The organizing committee was scheduled to meet Wednesday to discuss the next steps for the contest, which had been put on hold last month.
A decision is expected by Friday on whether a new election day can be set or further postponement is required.
Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.