Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Conservative MPs Pierre Poilievre and Michael Barrett hold a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on July 23, 2020.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Opposition parties urged the Ethics Commissioner to expand his probe of the Finance Minister on Thursday after Bill Morneau disclosed to a parliamentary committee that he reimbursed the WE Charity $41,366 for expenses related to 2017 travel with the organization.

Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre said that Mr. Morneau has breached multiple sections of the Conflict of Interest Act, which lays out rules for public office holders.

“He admitted that he didn’t pay $41,000 in expenses for travel he did with this organization,” Mr. Poilievre said at a Thursday news conference.

Story continues below advertisement

“The average Canadian would notice if there was a $41 bill missing from their room service at a hotel, but Bill Morneau would have you believe that for an entire week, he was showered with luxury, with benefits, with hospitality and that he had no idea who was paying for it all.”

Members of Parliament are allowed to accept travel paid for by other organizations as long as they disclose this on the public registry of sponsored travel. Ministers and parliamentary secretaries are not allowed to do so.

The Ethics Commissioner’s office has also stated that accepting such travel would be subject to the rules related to accepting gifts under the Conflict of Interest Act. That section says no public office holder can accept a gift “that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence the public office holder in the exercise of an official power, duty or function.” The act does allow for some exceptions, such as gifts from friends and relatives.

Mr. Morneau is already the subject of a separate probe by Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion after he failed to recuse himself from a cabinet decision giving WE Charity administration over the Canada Student Service Grant. The program was designed to compensate young people for volunteer work during the pandemic.

The contribution agreement, totalling $912-million, has since been cancelled. The government said last week that WE Charity could have received up to $43.5-million of that amount for overseeing the grant program.

Mr. Morneau, whose daughter works for WE, has said that he should not have been part of the cabinet discussion.

Maéva Proteau, a spokeswoman for Mr. Morneau, added Thursday that the Minister expected and always intended to pay for the costs of these trips and believed he had.

Story continues below advertisement

“He acknowledged that not doing so – even unknowingly – was not appropriate,” she said in a statement. “Minister Morneau has formally asked the Ethics Commissioner to consider these issues as part of his examination.”

On Thursday evening, the House of Commons ethics committee approved the launch of a third committee inquiry into the issue. The new probe will focus on looking at the “policies, procedures and practices surrounding the ethical conduct and avoidance of conflicts of interest within the Prime Minister’s Office.”

The ethics committee has already approved a motion calling on the government to produce documents related to WE speaking appearances by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his immediate family that have been arranged since 2008. The committee has also asked for Mr. Trudeau to appear as a witness.

The Prime Minister’s Office said Wednesday that he will testify before the House finance committee, adding that arrangements will be made regarding date and time.

On Wednesday, Mr. Morneau told the finance committee, which has been holding hearings into the WE controversy, that he repaid the charity for expenses covered for trips his family took to Kenya and Ecuador three years ago.

In his testimony, the Minister said his wife and daughter travelled to Kenya in the summer of 2017 to learn about WE school projects and that later that year, he travelled to Ecuador with his family to see and participate in WE’s humanitarian work in that country.

Story continues below advertisement

WE Charity issued a statement on Wednesday evening to say that from time to time, it invites current and potential supporters on a complimentary basis to see the impact of its global projects.

Many international charities and humanitarian agencies operate in a similar manner, it added.

“WE Charity extended the invitation to Nancy McCain and Bill Morneau because they are well-known philanthropists with a history of significant donations to international development programs,” the charity said.

“[Tuesday], the Morneau-McCain family reached out to us to ask if, in fact, their trip had been complimentary. We confirmed that it was.”

NDP ethics critic Charlie Angus said Thursday that Mr. Morneau’s testimony elevates the conflict-of-interest issue much higher than his original failure to recuse himself from the cabinet table.

“Minister Morneau just doesn’t seem to understand that he has a legal obligation to follow as the Finance Minister in this country,” Mr. Angus said.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Poilievre is calling on the Prime Minister to fire the Minister, adding that he believes that hasn’t happened because if Mr. Trudeau imposes this ethical standard on Mr. Morneau, then others will ask that he impose it on himself.

The Prime Minister himself is the subject of an ethics investigation by the commissioner.

He has also apologized to Canadians for failing to recuse himself from the cabinet table when the contribution agreement with WE was discussed.

With reports from Marieke Walsh

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies