Skip to main content

New restrictions on sugary, purified alcoholic beverages took effect Thursday, following several months of federal consultations and at least two deaths over an 18-month span.

The alcohol content in what Health Canada described as “single-serve flavoured purified alcoholic beverages” can no longer exceed 25.6 ml for each container of one litre or less.

Health Canada is taking measures to crack down on sugary high-alcohol drinks, such as those that played a part in the 2018 drowning death of one Quebec teen.

Elaine Thompson/The Associated Press

The amount is the equivalent of about one and a half drinks; a single serving could previously contain up to four standard alcohol drinks.

Story continues below advertisement

The changes come after the 2018 death of Quebec teenager Athena Gervais, who drowned in a creek after quickly consuming several sugary alcoholic drinks.

A coroner reported this year that Gervais, 14, consumed most of three 568-ml cans of a beverage called FCKD UP – the equivalent of 12 glasses of wine – in the span of half an hour on Feb. 26, 2018.

Her body was found a few days later and the teen’s death raised questions about the drinks and their marketing to youth. Health Canada consulted extensively before introducing the new rules Thursday.

Given the “seriousness of the situation,” Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor said in a statement Thursday that the rules are effective immediately and there will be no transition period.

The industry was well aware of the changes that were coming – in the weeks following Gervais’ death, Montreal-area Groupe Geloso stopped producing FCKD UP and destroyed its inventories while allowing stores to liquidate their stock.

Not long after, U.S. competitor Phusion Projects followed the example and stopped distribution of Four Loko.

Educ’alcool, a Quebec non-profit that promotes responsible drinking, said it is disappointed with the new rules, which it called too permissive.

Story continues below advertisement

The organization believes the federal government missed an opportunity to crack down on the relatively new industry and will fail to protect young people who need it the most.

Hubert Sacy said the federal government consulted but didn’t listen to prevention and public-health organizations, and didn’t address marketing and packaging concerns.

“No one can understand how they can limit it to one-and-a-half servings of alcohol in one standard can,” Mr. Sacy said. “Nobody counts their drinks by a glass-and-a-half and, moreover, there’s absolutely nothing about labelling, packaging and the design of these drinks.”

Mr. Sacy added the federal government didn’t even listen to the Quebec coroner, Martin Larocque, who also recommended containers under one litre be limited to one serving, rather than the 1.5 servings proposed by Health Canada.

The coroner had also suggested restrictions on the appearance and marketing of products, including a ban on names or slogans that “trivialize excessive alcohol consumption, inebriety or alcohol dependence.”

Under the rules creating a new class of “flavoured purified alcohol beverage,” a 568-ml drink would be capped at 4.5 per cent alcohol. A 355-ml can could contain up to 7.2 per cent alcohol while a 473-ml container could have up to 5.4 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

Health Canada said an exemption would be made for beverages packaged in glass containers with a 750-ml volume or higher, since those drinks are typically intended for multiple servings.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies