Skip to main content

The Canada 150 rink on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Dec. 7, 2017.

The Canadian Press

An $8.2-million ice rink set up on Parliament Hill over the winter was used by about 150,000 skaters, newly disclosed government documents show – averaging a cost of about $53 a person or $100,000 a day.

The free-to-use Canada 150 rink was initially unveiled for a three-week run on Parliament in December, along with a lengthy set of rules: there was to be no hockey, no tag, no carrying children, and no speed or figure skating. After media reports about the cost, Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly decided to keep the rink open an extra two months, until Feb. 25.

The rink was also supposed to host a peewee hockey tournament, which ended up being moved indoors because of extreme cold.

Story continues below advertisement

This week, in response to a question tabled in Parliament by NDP MP Peter Julian, the government disclosed the final statistics on the rink’s use: it was open for 882 hours of public skating (plus 133 for programming) and used by a total of 152,089 skaters.

The government response said the final bill was unknown. But the total cost, including the construction, tournament and two-month extension adds up to $8.2-million, according to the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation.

That works out to about $53 a person, $9,300 an hour of public skating time or $100,000 a day.

Ms. Joly said in November that the rink’s boards, glass and netting would be given to a “vulnerable” community in the Ottawa-Gatineau region.

That has yet to happen, and Mr. Julian asked when the name of the recipient would be announced. The government response said the donation process was “ongoing.”

The Ottawa International Hockey Festival, which is responsible for selecting the recipient of the rink, said it was just finalizing the application forms, but had already identified at least 10 potential recipients.

OIHF board member Aaron Robinson said they would be looking for a group with “a solid plan or proposal in terms of how they’ll use the rink itself and how it’ll be accessible, and making sure that it’s used in the proper way.”

Story continues below advertisement

He deferred questions about costs to the government.

“This ice rink had the potential to be a fun and spontaneous experience for Canadians,” Conservative heritage critic Peter Van Loan said in a statement. “Unfortunately, because of the Liberal government’s fiscal mismanagement, costs were allowed to run out of control. Once again the Liberals have through incompetence taken an idea with great potential and turned it into a disappointment.“

“It’s unfortunate that the government is not being more upfront about the cost of this,” said NDP MP Pierre Nantel, his party’s heritage critic. “It’s good to see that many people were able to get on the ice and take advantage of the rink despite the extreme cold, but the government may want to think twice next time about building the Rolls-Royce of skating rinks on Parliament Hill.”

The rink was awarded the federal “Teddy Government Waste Award,” given by the Canadian Taxpayers’ Federation to the most wasteful government projects.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.