Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer is warning political parties that it won’t be able to cost out all of their platform pledges if there is a snap election this year.

The 2019 federal election campaign was the first one conducted under new rules that give the PBO a role in costing campaign promises upon request from political parties. The process gave voters an independent assessment of the likely cost or savings that could result from implementation, and received generally favourable reviews from policy experts.

The PBO is a non-partisan office of public servants who work on behalf of members of Parliament, rather than the government. It specializes in providing costing estimates and projections related to government spending and revenue. The office had expressed reservations in 2017 when Parliament approved the changes giving it a role in political campaigns.

Story continues below advertisement

‘True partner’ for Alberta: O’Toole confident in western support with possible election looming

The challenge this year is that if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau requests an election, it will be out of sync with legal rules centred on a fixed election date every four years, on the third Monday in October. A campaign must be at least 36 days and no longer than 50 days.

Under a fixed election cycle, parties can start working with the PBO as soon as 120 days before the fixed election date. But in a snap election scenario, the PBO is only legally allowed to receive costing requests from political parties on day one of a campaign.

That means that rather than having the summer to research proposals, PBO officials will be under pressure to quickly turn around a flood of requests. It also means parties may not have access to the PBO’s independent costing should they wish to announce specific measures in the first week or two of the campaign.

Jason Jacques, the PBO’s chief financial officer and director-general, said in an interview that the office is expecting a “deluge” of spending requests from political parties on the first day of a campaign, should one be called this year.

“We’re simply not going to be in a position to cost everything at this point,” he said, adding that the PBO has told parties they will need to prioritize their requests. Mr. Jacques said the PBO will, however, be able to once again provide an updated “baseline” forecast on the state of federal finances that all party platforms can use as a common starting point.

The PBO only publishes its costing reports with the approval of the requesting party. The policy is meant to give parties the flexibility of requesting a costing analysis and then choosing to abandon the idea. During the 2019 campaign, the Conservative Party and the NDP generally released the accompanying PBO costing report on the same day that a pledge was announced. In contrast, the Liberals chose not to release the PBO reports until the full platform was revealed.

Spokespersons for the Conservatives and the NDP both questioned the need for an election. The Conservatives said Tuesday that their eventual platform will be fully costed, while the NDP stated that it will work with the PBO to the extent of their capacity. The Liberal Party also said it will work with the PBO on an eventual platform.

Story continues below advertisement

Carleton University associate professor Jennifer Robson, who teaches public policy analysis and co-authored a paper on the PBO’s campaign costing work for the Canadian Tax Journal, said the PBO’s role brings Canada in line with countries such as Australia, Ireland and the Netherlands, which have similar independent campaign costing.

“The bottom line here is that it’s providing a common foundation to basically verify the fiscal plans of each of the competing parties, and it makes it easier for voters to compare commitments,” she said. “Hypothetically it should encourage parties to have more thoughtful platforms.”

From a practical point of view, Prof. Robson said the shortened timeline may lead parties to save their more complicated announcements for later in the campaign when the PBO costing is ready.

University of British Columbia economics professor Kevin Milligan said the PBO’s independent costing provides a valuable public service.

“I think it worked extraordinarily well in that all parties participated in the process and the PBO did, on the whole, a very good job,” said Prof. Milligan, who returned to academia in May after nearly one year as a special advisor on economic recovery matters with the federal public service. “I think it really improved the quality of the discourse around the election.”

He said the rules should be changed to address the fact that minority Parliaments often do not last the full four years until the fixed election date.

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies