Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Katie Telford, chief of staff to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, arrives for the first day of a Liberal cabinet retreat in Ottawa, on Sept. 14, 2020.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s chief of staff knew in March, 2018, of an allegation of misconduct involving then-chief of the defence staff Jonathan Vance, a former aide said Friday.

Elder Marques, a senior adviser inside the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) until December, 2019, told the House of Commons defence committee that Katie Telford or her assistant requested that he contact the then-chief of staff to Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan on an issue about Mr. Vance.

“I know I spoke to the [Prime Minister’s] chief of staff,” Mr. Marques said. “I think that’s how my involvement in this issue originated.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Marques’s testimony is the first assertion that Ms. Telford was directly aware of concerns about Mr. Vance three years ago. Last month, The Globe and Mail asked the PMO multiple times whether she was aware of the matter. On March 12, Mr. Trudeau said his office knew of allegations that were directed to independent authorities but did not know the details of those allegations.

Despite the lack of details on the nature of the allegation, Mr. Marques said the office assumed the complaint could be very serious and that is why the office acted the way that it did.

Major tells committee Jonathan Vance ordered her to lie about their relationship

Survivors, experts ask Ottawa to set up independent mechanism for military sexual misconduct

The Liberal government has been under political pressure in recent weeks since former military ombudsman Gary Walbourne told a parliamentary committee that he presented Mr. Sajjan with an allegation about Mr. Vance in March, 2018, when he was chief of the defence staff. Mr. Sajjan declined to see the evidence, but told Zita Astravas, Mr. Sajjan’s former chief of staff, about the matter.

Mr. Marques told the committee on Friday that he spoke to Ms. Astravas in early March, 2018, and she advised him that Mr. Walbourne initiated an unscheduled discussion alone with her minister. Mr. Marques said in that meeting, Ms. Astravas told him Mr. Walbourne raised an allegation of personal misconduct against the chief of defence staff and there were no other details provided.

Mr. Marques said he then met with then-clerk of the Privy Council Office (PCO) Michael Wernick, who referred the matter to Janine Sherman who is in charge of personnel. Mr. Wernick recently testified that Ms. Sherman was not able to obtain further information from Mr. Walbourne on the allegation. Mr. Walbourne said that he did not have permission from the complainant to share evidence.

Ms. Telford did not respond to a request for comment made to the PMO on Friday. A spokesperson for Mr. Trudeau, Alex Wellstead, said the office takes all allegations seriously and ensures they are followed up on by appropriate independent authorities.

“That is exactly what happened in this situation,” Mr. Wellstead said.

Story continues below advertisement

After Mr. Walbourne received a complaint, Mr. Sajjan directed him to officials who could investigate and the PCO received no further information and was unable to investigate, Mr. Wellstead added.

Mr. Wernick said Friday he believes political staff should be expected to appear before the committee if their actions and communications on behalf of a minister are directly relevant.

For his part, Mr. Trudeau maintains he did not have direct knowledge of the matter involving Mr. Vance in 2018. Mr. Marques said he did not brief the Prime Minister on this issue and he was not aware of any briefings of Mr. Trudeau on the matter.

Conservative defence critic James Bezan said it is simply not believable that Mr. Trudeau was not aware of allegations.

“It is outrageous to believe that everyone around Justin Trudeau was aware of these allegations but the Prime Minister didn’t know,” he said.

NDP defence critic Randall Garrison said Friday’s testimony leaves very little doubt about how widespread knowledge of Mr. Vance’s misconduct was.

Story continues below advertisement

“It is very difficult for Canadians to believe the Prime Minister’s chief of staff kept this crucial information from him and he had no knowledge of the allegations,” he said.

It is time for the Prime Minister and Mr. Sajjan to take responsibility for “this failure,” Mr. Garrison added, noting survivors and all women serving in the Canadian Armed Forces are owed an apology from the government for leaving Mr. Vance in his role.

Mr. Trudeau, who has promised the creation of an independent mechanism for reporting allegations of sexual misconduct in the military, told reporters on Friday that his government is working closely with various organizations to move forward in the right way and that it will have more to say shortly.

On Thursday evening, Major Kellie Brennan told members of the House of Commons status of women committee that Mr. Vance ordered her to lie about their relationship and told her otherwise, there would be “consequences.”

Maj. Brennan alleges that they were in a relationship while she was a subordinate, which she said began in 2001 and continued after he was named defence chief in 2015. Maj. Brennan said she disclosed this information to the Canadian Forces National Investigative Service (CFNIS).

Maj. Brennan said the CFNIS interviewed her twice, for six hours on each occasion, as part of its investigation into Mr. Vance and she provided evidence. She also said she asked the CFNIS officials whether they had the mandate to investigate and the power to lay charges, adding they would not answer her.

Story continues below advertisement

She also said Mr. Vance is the father of two of her children. “He’s not responsible to pay or to have those children under his responsibility. It’s all up to me.”

Mr. Vance has denied any wrongdoing in an interview with Global News but otherwise has not commented on Maj. Brennan’s allegations.

With a report from Marieke Walsh

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies