Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki speaks during a news conference in Ottawa on Oct. 21, 2020.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Commissioner Brenda Lucki has ordered a review of RCMP records policy after a watchdog report found that police destroyed recordings and transcripts of their communications from the night Colten Boushie died.

The Commissioner said in testimony before a recent parliamentary committee that the force will re-examine its records retention policy to ensure that “it is in line with reality.” The national police force is facing calls from Indigenous leaders and the federal NDP to explain why records were destroyed.

A report into police handling of the case by the independent Civilian Complaints and Review Commission expressed “disappointment and frustration” with the police decision to destroy recorded communications between the officers who responded to the fatal shooting.

Story continues below advertisement

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki must go

Mr. Boushie, a 22-year-old Cree man, was shot to death in August, 2016, when he and four companions drove onto property owned by Saskatchewan farmer Gerald Stanley. Mr. Stanley was eventually found not guilty of second-degree murder in a case that sparked protests across the country.

A CRCC report released last week found that the RCMP racially discriminated against Mr. Boushie’s family members when they were notified of his death. The report also revealed that when the CRCC requested records of police radio and telephone calls, the RCMP said the records had already been destroyed.

The recordings were deemed to have no evidentiary value to the criminal investigation, the RCMP told the CRCC, and were disposed of in August, 2018, two years after the events in question, in keeping with records retention policy.

However, the CRCC investigation was announced in March, 2018, five months before the two-year disposal date. A civil suit launched by Mr. Boushie’s family was also filed before August, 2018. Both of those matters should have created an obligation to retain all relevant records, according to counsel for Debbie Baptiste, Mr. Boushie’s mother.

In her committee testimony on Wednesday, Commissioner Lucki insisted that the destruction of the records was a routine matter.

“In no way was it a coverup,” she said.

She added that when the request for the records came from the CRCC, the records had already been destroyed. She said that the major-crimes investigators handling the investigation into Mr. Stanley in Saskatchewan had determined that the recordings had no evidentiary value to the criminal case.

Story continues below advertisement

“They were just left where they get stored in their usual manner and within two years, as per the retentions act, it got destroyed. And then the CRCC asked for them and that’s why we couldn’t produce them,” Commissioner Lucki said.

NDP public safety critic Jack Harris said there seems to have been a policy failure.

“Clearly it is not appropriate for them to use the standard of whether it was relevant to the criminal investigation,” Mr. Harris said. “They should not have destroyed those records.”

Chris Murphy, a lawyer for Ms. Baptiste, also said Commissioner Lucki’s response is not sufficient. She must initiate an investigation to find out who decided those records didn’t need to be retained and what they knew of their contents, he said.

“If the records painted the RCMP in a bad light and the officer knew they’d be destroyed, that’s pretty close to the definition of a coverup,” Mr. Murphy said.

He said the family has maintained from the beginning that the records of police communications would have proved that the RCMP did not have reasonable grounds to search Ms. Baptiste’s home on the night her son died.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Baptiste’s brother, Alvin, initiated a complaint in late 2016 about RCMP conduct that night, long before the records might have been up for destruction, he added.

“At that point it was clear that what the RCMP knew and when they knew it was going to be questioned,” Mr. Murphy said.

Assembly of First Nations Chief Perry Bellegarde said he was encouraged to see that Commissioner Lucki has announced plans for a policy review with respect to the preservation and protection of evidence.

“The AFN strongly urges that First Nations be fully involved in any review,” he said, adding that “Commissioner Lucki’s comments remain devoid of any meaningful statement of wrongdoing.”

It is “completely ridiculous and embarrassing” that the RCMP has denied it did anything wrong by destroying the records, said Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations Chief Bobby Cameron.

“They did do wrong. Stop defending what you’ve done.”

Story continues below advertisement

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies