Skip to main content

More than 100 all-candidate election debates on the environment have been rescheduled for Oct. 3 after a conflict that originally put them on the same night as a televised leaders’ debate.

GreenPAC, a non-partisan organization dedicated to electing environmentalist candidates, is helping to organize candidates’ debates in 117 ridings that were originally supposed to take place Oct. 7 – the same date, it turns out, as an English-language national leaders’ debate being organized by the Leaders’ Debates Commission.

The commission saw the conflict as unfortunate, but showed little willingness to reschedule its event, said Sabrina Bowman, GreenPAC’s executive director.

Story continues below advertisement

“I never felt that they were able to offer something that would really help address the problems,” said Ms. Bowman, who wanted the commission’s help in refunding deposits for venues that had already been booked and costs incurred by promotions.

In an e-mailed statement, a spokesperson for the commission said it wasn’t prepared to change its date, and believes its events “don’t preclude any other debates from happening.”

“We’re always prepared to continue discussions with these groups and others,” the statement said.

Despite the new date, some local organizers won’t be able to reschedule, including in the Ontario riding of Leeds-Grenville, Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes.

“This is a real shame as splitting the debates onto different days could reduce the overall impact” of the one hundred-plus environment debates, said Sarah Tuck, an organizer in the riding.

Cindy Toth, vice-chair of the Halton Environmental Network and a local organizer, also worried that their effort would go to waste due to the date change.

“So much was already in place, and while we may be able to rebook venues, the issue will be trying to achieve the high level of participation of local candidates,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies