Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Senate pages staff the doors to the Red Chamber on Parliament Hill in Ottawa.

The Globe and Mail

Mary Jane McCallum says she spoke to elders and decided to move ahead with a motion to expel Lynn Beyak from the Red Chamber for one purpose: to elevate the voices of residential school survivors who have been harmed by Ms. Beyak’s actions.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Ms. McCallum, herself a survivor of the schools, said she did not act out of vengeance when she decided to bring forward the motion, which she expects the Senate to discuss in February. She said she was thinking of the former students who “have no voice.”

“That needs some form of justice,” said the Manitoba senator, who as a dentist provided dental care to First Nations in her province. “We could not just leave it sitting there.”

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. McCallum said she is speaking out now to give more context to her decision to bring forward the motion and to address persistent harms to Indigenous people. She said Ms. Beyak’s actions caused extensive damage, and the Senate as an institution must look within to address the institutional racism that has let the situation play out for so long.

She said she had talks with elders from Quebec, Ontario and Manitoba to hear their thoughts on the motion, which was introduced earlier this month.

Ms. Beyak, an Ontario senator, had posted letters on her website about residential schools that were deemed to be racist by the Senate. Her office has not commented on the motion.

The former member of the Conservative caucus was suspended without pay in the spring of 2019, after she refused to remove the letters. That suspension ended when Parliament dissolved the following fall for the federal election.

At the end of February, the Senate voted to suspend Ms. Beyak again after it approved a report on her conduct from the standing committee on ethics and conflict of interest for senators. The report recommended she be suspended without pay for the duration of the parliamentary session, that she apologize and participate in educational programs.

In a report in June, the Senate ethics committee recommended rescinding the February suspension of Ms. Beyak.

“While it will be for all senators to judge its sufficiency, your committee is satisfied that, in her letter of apology, Senator Beyak adequately acknowledges and understands the impact of her conduct and offers thoughtful reflection on her educational experience and what she has learned as a result,” the committee wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. McCallum has said that the prorogation of Parliament in August prevented senators from discussing the issue further, and reinstated Ms. Beyak as a senator in good standing.

Ms. McCallum, who was appointed to the Senate in December, 2017, and attended residential school beginning at age five, said that Ms. Beyak’s actions have taken racism to a new level.

She also questions why mistruths and stereotypes about Indigenous people were allowed to be expressed in the Senate, such as when Ms. Beyak defended her actions in May, 2019, particularly while Indigenous senators were present.

“Would that be allowed to happen anywhere?” she said. “Would someone at a university or anywhere else, any other institution, would they be allowed to carry on?”

Ms. McCallum said she is not sure how much support her motion to expel Ms. Beyak will have. But she wants the discussion to explore the role of institutional racism in the Senate, white privilege and its effects.

Discussions in the Senate in response to the situation have never been serious enough, she added.

Story continues below advertisement

“Things will go as they should and I am just glad that we are going to have the opportunity to discuss this on the Senate floor,” Ms. McCallum said. “As senators, we really need to look at all the issues … that allowed this to happen.”

Ms. McCallum also said she was shocked by recent comments from Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole on residential schools, particularly because of the increased discussion in recent months about systemic racism in such areas as policing and health care institutions.

On Dec. 16, Mr. O’Toole issued a statement after he faced criticism from Indigenous leaders for telling Ryerson University students the residential school system was an attempt to provide education.

“It was not,” his statement said. “The system was intended to remove children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures.”

Mr. O’Toole’s remarks were made to a Conservative club at Ryerson University and were posted on Facebook in November. They garnered attention after the website PressProgress posted them on Dec. 15.

His follow-up statement came after Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde expressed dismay over the remarks. Mr. Bellegarde said it was disappointing to see Mr. O’Toole use the residential school tragedy, which devastated generations of First Nations families, to score meaningless political points.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. O’Toole’s remarks caused damage, Ms. McCallum said, adding that racism was entrenched in young minds.

“What can he do now to take back and meaningfully address what he did? He is doing the same thing as Beyak.”

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies