Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Senate Speaker George Furey could announce a recall for the Senate as soon as this week.

The Canadian Press

Leaders of the various groups in the Senate are discussing a government request to recall the chamber after senators faced criticism for recessing for the summer without passing a bill that would effectively ban the practice of conversion therapy.

The decision to recall the Senate will ultimately be in the hands of Speaker George Furey, who could announce a recall as soon as this week.

With a potential federal election on the horizon, Liberals are blaming Conservative MPs and senators for the fact that the bill is not yet law. However the Conservatives say it is the Liberals who are playing “cynical political games” and using the LGBTQ+ community as “political pawns.”

Story continues below advertisement

Government, advocates express disappointment with Senate for not passing conversion therapy and broadcast bills

Conversion therapy is a widely criticized practice aimed at changing someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Bill C-6 includes a proposed amendment to the Criminal Code that would ban forcing someone to undergo conversion therapy against their will.

The bill has clearly divided the Conservative caucus. At third reading in the House of Commons last month, 62 Conservative MPs voted against Bill C-6, as did independent MP Derek Sloan, who was elected as a Conservative. Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole was among the 51 Conservative MPs who voted in favour.

The leaders of the three groups of independent senators all confirmed to The Globe and Mail on Sunday that there have been behind-the-scenes discussions about a proposal to recall the Senate, but that no final decision has yet been made.

The leader of the 41-member Independent Senators Group, Yuen Pau Woo, said Sunday that the ISG is open to working through the summer if needed.

“A recall of the Senate is in the hands of the Speaker. I do not know if he will issue a recall, but ISG senators are ready and willing to work,” he said on Sunday.

Senator Scott Tannas, who leads the 12-member Canadian Senators Group, said he’s concerned the Senate may be facing pressure to quickly pass the bill this month without a thorough study or amendments.

“I’ve got some questions about that,” he said. “I understand, you know, there’s politics involved. People are preparing for an election and everybody wants to put their best foot forward, and potentially stick their foot out to trip up the other guy. But I’m more interested in good legislation and so I’m scratching my head a bit.”

Story continues below advertisement

On June 29, the Senate adjourned until mid-September after only passing two of four bills that the government had identified as priorities. The Senate approved Bill C-36, the budget bill, and C-12, dealing with climate change targets. However the Senate did not pass C-6, nor did it pass Bill C-10, a controversial proposal to regulate online streaming services such as Netflix via an update to the Broadcasting Act.

Several senators argued at the time that the House failed to give the Senate enough time to review the bills, given that all four were sent to the Senate in the second half of June.

The day after the Senate adjourned, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the government was in discussions with the Senate leadership about recalling the chamber. Then on Friday afternoon, Senator Marc Gold, who represents the government in the Senate, released a proposal to recall the Senate to deal with C-6, but not C-10.

“Since we adjourned on Tuesday, June 29, it has become increasingly clear that an inability of the Senate to complete its study of this legislation before the fall has generated a great deal of concern, anxiety and frustration for those in our LGBTQ2 community,” he wrote.

The proposal would see the Senate recalled as soon as possible in order to approve a study of C-6 by the Senate’s legal and constitutional affairs committee, with a deadline of no later than July 26. The Senate would then reconvene and hold a final vote by July 30 at the latest.

Conservative Senator Leo Housakos issued a statement Friday accusing the Liberals of playing cynical games at the expense of the LGBTQ+ community.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s not the first time Mr. Trudeau has put on a public display of concern for a group of marginalized Canadians in nothing more than a cynical attempt to embarrass his opponents. Nor will it be the last,” he said.

Critics of the Liberals note that the government did not treat the bill with much urgency when it was in the House. The bill was first introduced in March, 2020, but died on the order paper when the government prorogued Parliament later that year. It was then reintroduced as C-6 in October. After it emerged from committee in December, it was not debated in the House until April, for one day. The government only scheduled one day of debate on the bill in May before three final days in June.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies