Skip to main content

The Speaker of the House of Commons is declining to weigh in on allegations that the Finance Minister’s office tried to intimidate an insurance group.

In announcing his decision Thursday, Geoff Regan said Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre took too long to submit his complaint.

Mr. Poilievre raised what is called a question of privilege on May 31, asking the Speaker to rule that Bill Morneau’s office violated the rights of MPs by “threatening” potential committee witnesses.

Story continues below advertisement

The complaint was based on a May 14 report in The Globe and Mail in which two officials from the Canadian Association of Mutual Insurance Companies said they had each received an “angry” phone call from the minister’s office. The two officials said that they were asked by the minister’s office to stop raising concerns about Bank Act changes in the minister’s budget bill with MPs and senators and to not appear before parliamentary committees.

The minister’s office acknowledged that two “frank and direct” phone calls took place, but denied telling the insurance group to stop communicating with parliamentarians.

In announcing his decision, the Speaker noted that the rules require MPs to raise such complaints “as soon as practicable” after becoming aware of the information. As a result, he would not comment on the substance of Mr. Poilievre’s complaint.

“This matter was clearly not raised at the first opportunity,” Mr. Regan said.

Mr. Poilievre said Thursday that he was disappointed his complaint was dismissed on a technicality. He also said he stands by his original concerns.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter