Skip to main content
Don’t miss our
best deal ever
offer ends july 23
save over $160
Sale ends in
$6
for
6 months
Don’t miss our
best deal ever
$6
for 6 months
save over $160
// //

The Canadian Forces flag flies outside office buildings in Ottawa, on March 9, 2021.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau defended his top aide, Katie Telford, on Tuesday and said no one in his office was aware that former chief of defence staff Jonathan Vance was facing a “Me Too complaint” in early 2018.

Elder Marques, a former senior adviser inside the Prime Minister’s Office, testified before the House of Commons defence committee on Friday that he spoke with Ms. Telford about a concern related to Mr. Vance three years ago. Since his appearance, opposition parties have asked Mr. Trudeau to take personal responsibility for the way the situation was handled and raised questions about what and when the Prime Minister knew about the allegations against the country’s top soldier.

Tuesday marked the first time Mr. Trudeau has sought to clarify the nature of what the PMO knew back in 2018. Mr. Trudeau says he did not personally know about the matter until he learned of it in news reports.

Story continues below advertisement

Liberals questioned on Trudeau aide’s knowledge of sexual misconduct allegations against Vance in 2018

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan needs to take responsibility for the Vance controversy

During a news conference in Ottawa, Mr. Trudeau said a concern about Mr. Vance was brought to Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan in March, 2018, by then military watchdog Gary Walbourne. The minister forwarded it to appropriate authorities at the Privy Council Office (PCO), the department that supports the Prime Minister in cabinet, for follow-up, Mr. Trudeau said.

“The minister, my office, knew there was a complaint against General Vance,” Mr. Trudeau said. “Nobody knew that it was a Me Too complaint. We did not have information on what was the nature of that complaint.”

Later in Question Period, Mr. Trudeau said in French there was no one in his office or in Mr. Sajjan’s office who knew the nature of the complaint.

Mr. Walbourne told The Globe and Mail in an interview on Tuesday he was surprised by the Prime Minister’s comments, adding that he told Mr. Sajjan that he had “an allegation of inappropriate sexual behaviour against the chief of defence staff.”

“I did tell him what type of complaint I had received,” Mr. Walbourne said. “The minister clearly, clearly knew what I was holding.”

For his part, Mr. Vance has denied any wrongdoing in an interview with Global News, but otherwise has not commented.

The Globe first reported on March 5 that the PMO was aware of the allegation about Mr. Vance in 2018.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Trudeau said Tuesday that Ms. Telford’s leadership is why the Liberal government calls itself a feminist government. He also said that when the PCO was alerted to the matter, the office was unable to obtain further facts necessary on the details because Mr. Walbourne didn’t have permission to share it.

“This highlights the situation that unfortunately is far too real for far too many people facing this, in that they don’t feel like there is a process that supports them and protects them,” Mr. Trudeau said.

During Question Period on Tuesday, Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole asked whether Mr. Trudeau would be “honest” with the House of Commons and with women serving in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) that he was aware of the allegations involving Mr. Vance and that the Prime Minister “failed them for three years.”

Conservative defence critic James Bezan also said Mr. Trudeau is misleading Canadians. He pointed to e-mails from PCO’s Janine Sherman that refer to Mr. Walbourne’s concerns about allegations of sexual harassment.

NDP defence critic Randall Garrison said several witnesses who have appeared before the House of Commons national defence committee affirmed that many people knew the allegations related to sexual misconduct. The committee is set to meet again Friday.

Mr. Garrison also questioned how the Liberal government could leave Mr. Vance in charge of the program to root out sexual misconduct for three years after there were allegations against him.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2015, the military established Operation Honour to eliminate harmful and inappropriate sexual behaviour within the Forces. It was established after former Supreme Court justice Marie Deschamps issued a report on sexual misconduct within the military.

“If this is a feminist government, then someone must take responsibility for the failure to investigate and remove Vance,” Mr. Garrison said. “It is either the Prime Minister or the Minister of Defence and it’s time for them to decide which one is going to take the responsibility.”

During testimony last month, Lieutenant-General Wayne Eyre, the acting head of the CAF, told the status of women committee that Operation Honour had “culminated” and the Forces must look at moving forward with a plan that includes military members and public-servant colleagues.

Mr. Walbourne said Tuesday the federal government must urgently set up an independent body outside of the chain of command that can report to Parliament to confront the issue of sexual misconduct in the military.

Know what is happening in the halls of power with the day’s top political headlines and commentary as selected by Globe editors (subscribers only). Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies