Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks to news media along with cabinet members in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada February 21, 2020. Mr. Trudeau argued that he had done all he could to find a peaceful resolution.

PATRICK DOYLE/Reuters

There was more than one message in Justin Trudeau’s call for the barricades to come down. One was that the government was losing patience, and that there soon would be action. The other was that Indigenous leaders now had a last chance to intervene to persuade protesters to end the blockades, and that public support for reconciliation was on the line.

That second message was Mr. Trudeau’s last faint hope at having Indigenous communities end the blockades before police step in. The government has always been concerned that that could make things worse, sparking violence or more blockades, the Prime Minister acknowledged. Now, he was making a direct appeal to Indigenous leaders to not let that happen.

A Prime Minister who had always declared Canada’s relationship with Indigenous peoples to be its most important was putting the onus on Indigenous leaders to save it. That could just as easily backfire as succeed.

Story continues below advertisement

At Friday’s news conference, Mr. Trudeau went out of his way to distinguish between Indigenous and non-Indigenous protesters, between those, he said, who had a legitimate, historic grievance for being marginalized, and those who have a current disagreement. He indicated that sentiment about the blockade is mixed in First Nations such as Tyendinaga and Kahnawake.

That was a way of saying to Indigenous communities across the country that their political agenda was being taken over and steered in ways they don’t really want. It amounted to arguing that it is up to chiefs to defuse the protests.

It isn’t at all clear that anything like that will happen. On Tuesday, Grand Chief Serge Otsi Simon of the Kanesetake Mohawk Grand Council pleaded with protesters to pause the blockades as a sign of good faith, warning that it could set back relations between Ottawa and First Nations, and delay Canada’s adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. On Wednesday, after complaints from within his community, Mr. Simon retracted his call for the blockades to come down.

And Mr. Trudeau’s suggestion on Friday that the onus is on Indigenous leaders to save reconciliation could spark a backlash.

Politically, the Prime Minister clearly decided that his reconciliation agenda was at risk. Liberal MPs had been saying that their constituents were talking about nothing but the blockades, and demanding to know why the government wasn’t doing something to end it. Some of those MPs figured that voters would forget about it if it ended soon, but not if it dragged on and on.

Complaints that the rail blockades are causing real harm are growing, too. A thousand rail workers were laid off. Shipments were blocked. Busy commuter trains from Montreal suburbs have been cancelled. There are fears that supplies of propane, used to heat large numbers of homes in rural areas of Ontario and Quebec, would run out within weeks.

So Mr. Trudeau signalled that his patience had run out – and that blockades must come down.

Story continues below advertisement

On Friday, Mr. Trudeau argued that he had done all he could to find a peaceful resolution – offered dialogue, dispatched ministers. And while he insisted that he had nothing to do with getting the RCMP to pull out of the Wet’suwet’en territory in British Columbia – politicians don’t tell police what to do, he said – he noted that the retreat fulfilled a key condition set by Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs. And still, he said, there was no reply. “We can’t have a dialogue when only one party is coming to the table,” he said.

Whatever the debates about whether he has done the right thing, there isn’t much doubt about the political message Mr. Trudeau received: that he couldn’t wait much longer.

Mr. Trudeau was right, in his speech on Tuesday when he adopted a much more conciliatory tone, when he said that this is a critical moment. His statement Friday that talks are going nowhere sets the clock ticking toward police intervention that could lead to violence or broader protests. He argued that continuing blockades will undermine public support for reconciliation, in effect warning that the impact will be long-lasting.

Mr. Trudeau clearly decided that he not only had no choice but to take that risk, and gamble a big chunk of the Trudeau brand, he also explicitly laid relations with Indigenous people on the line.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies