Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The two women campaigning to become Manitoba’s next premier squared off Tuesday night, both promising to revive a Progressive Conservative government that is running low in opinion polls.

Shelly Glover, a former Conservative member of Parliament who has not been elected provincially, promised a “head-snapping change” to the party’s culture during an 80-minute debate before Tory faithful.

On a few occasions, she went directly after Heather Stefanson, a long-time legislature member and former health minister who has the backing of most Tory caucus members.

Story continues below advertisement

“When you took over as minister of health, Heather, Manitobans needed leadership. And you by your own admission stayed in the backrooms while I went directly to the front lines,” said Glover, who took on a job as a health care aide during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“And to be a leader ... you must be where the action is.”

Stefanson, for the most part, did not directly criticize Glover. She touted her own experience as a two-decade member of the legislature. She said she worked to reduce the number of children in care as minister of family services and oversaw the COVID-19 vaccine rollout as health minister.

Stefanson also said she is more equipped to revive Tory fortunes in time for the next election, scheduled for October 2023.

“We need a leader with a team and a plan, and we need a leader who is ready to start work immediately.”

The Progressive Conservatives will select a replacement for former premier Brian Pallister by mail-in ballot on Oct. 30.

Stefanson, widely regarded as the front-runner, was first out of the gate in the race. She has the backing of 29 of her 35 fellow caucus members as well as some high-profile retired Tories.

Story continues below advertisement

Glover has worked to sign up new members before Thursday’s deadline. Anyone who joins after that will not be eligible to cast a vote for the leader.

She has also tried to paint Stefanson as a member of the Tory old guard, who she says has stopped listening to Manitobans’ concerns.

Glover promised to reverse some of the government’s spending cuts, such as the closure of rural Manitoba Hydro offices, agricultural service centres, and a jail in Dauphin.

That last promise drew a response at the debate from Stefanson.

“With all due respect, Shelly, while you are focusing on building jails, we will focus on building the economy.”

Glover’s campaign has had a few hiccups.

Story continues below advertisement

When she launched her bid, she said she had the support of Arlen Dumas, grand chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs. Dumas spoke positively of Glover but said the assembly was not endorsing any candidate.

An e-mail sent to Tory party members this week quoted former federal cabinet minister Peter MacKay as supporting Glover’s leadership bid.

MacKay posted on social media that he was not endorsing her.

“The release issued in my name was not authorized by me,” MacKay posted on Twitter.

“I wish both strong candidates who I have enormous respect 4 the very best.”

For subscribers: Get exclusive political news and analysis by signing up for the Politics Briefing.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies