Skip to main content

With the Super Bowl next weekend, a reader wrote to ask if we could please stop using the name of one of the teams (the Chiefs) in headlines.

“The removal of the team name could be done with all teams that use Indigenous mascots," she wrote. "Your organization has the power and privilege to make the change.”

I agree that demeaning or insulting names should be avoided in headlines – likewise for references to cartoonish logos and gestures. I passed her views on to The Globe and Mail’s style committee, a group of senior editors that advises the editor-in-chief on when to change and update language usage.

Story continues below advertisement

They may decide to consult with Indigenous and Inuit leaders and discuss what should be done. These are the proper names of the teams, and it would be difficult to avoid them altogether, but there is no need to amplify and draw attention to the names in big type, in my view. And there is an easy alternative: Call them by their city names. In the case of the Chiefs, just say Kansas City in headlines.

There will always be journalistic exceptions, such as if a team considers changing its name or an opinion columnist wants to make a point about a name.

The style committee, which rules on issues such as “Kyiv” over “Kiev,” has ruled in the past that it is key to ask Indigenous and Inuit people how they want to be described. The same goes for racialized or LGBTQ people. Canadian group Journalists for Human Rights has put out a guide for journalists that also makes this point.

I asked two Indigenous people – one a journalism research professor, the other a former CBC and CTV journalist – their views.

John Kelly, who is Haida and an adjunct research professor in journalism at Carleton University, said it is not so much the word, but what it demonstrates: a lack of respect.

These teams have nothing to do with Indigenous culture, and it is demeaning to use such terms that way, Prof. Kelly said. He added that it is always important to ask people how they want to be described – and I couldn’t agree more.

Sheila North, a former grand chief of the Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak (MKO) and a former CBC and CTV journalist, said that the Indigenous community is very diverse and many are big sports fans.

Story continues below advertisement

Some people feel it’s not offensive, that the naming represents the strength of Indigenous cultures, while others feel it reinforces negative stereotypes and does not take the culture seriously.

But ultimately, she said, people will get over a name change of a team that divides its fans. Ms. North said the media can play an important leadership role by showing that these names are not acceptable and by avoiding their use, especially in headlines.

How we use language must be constantly reviewed and updated, and this is no different than using “they” as a preferred pronoun for transgender people.

A few readers said they were confused by the use of that pronoun in last weekend’s personal essay by author Heather O’Neill, who wrote about her mother finding a new life beyond the gender binary and changing their name to Abraham.

This essay reinforced the need for the pronoun “they.”

Another reader wondered why we called one couple “common-law” and the other “partners.” Like her, I prefer partner and find common-law old-fashioned, but in these cases, it is best to let people describe their own relationship.

Story continues below advertisement

Basically the same rule should apply in all circumstances: Be respectful when describing people, listen to their preferences and remember that language is constantly evolving.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies