Skip to main content

An artist's conception of what the seven-acre development at Bloor and Dufferin streets in Toronto will look like.

CAPITAL DEVELOPMENTS

After a two-year negotiation over the zoning for a seven-acre development at Bloor and Dufferin in Toronto, the city, the local community and the developer announced an agreement last week on an “innovative” deal to create a $17-million fund to build affordable housing.

But Josh Bénard, Habitat for Humanity’s vice-president for real estate development, who brokered the deal, cautioned that it does not amount to a "get out of jail free card” for developers seeking a way out of the thorny problem of negotiating an appropriate level of affordable units in their projects.

Capital Developments and Metropia had committed to 56 units of affordable rental, or about 2.5 per cent of the units in the 2,162-unit condominium project at Bloor and Dufferin. The community group Build a Better Bloor Dufferin (BBBD) was asking for 20 per cent of the units to be affordable, or about 430 units.

Story continues below advertisement

The distance between those proposals set the stage for a deadlock – the kind that often ends up in the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

The fund may have been a card developers played to get a community on board with its plans, but Mr. Bénard stresses that if Capital Developments wasn’t already building 56 affordable units on the site, Habitat wouldn’t have agreed to put its name to the deal.

“You can’t just write a cheque and absolve yourself from building inclusive communities,” Mr. Bénard said. “Our brand has a lot of value and we do not hitch our brand or organization to just any business.”

“We’re trying to do things differently as a company," said Todd Cowan, Capital Developments co-founder and managing partner. "We believe in trying to find solutions other than just going to the OMB [or more recently LPAT] … in trying to find solutions that create a win-win for all involved.”

“Unfortunately, at the end of the day, we realized there was a big gap in terms of what was feasible,” said Jordan Dermer, the other co-founder and managing partner with Capital Developments.

Habitat for Humanity says its phone has been ringing off the hook with developers, philanthropists and other affordable-housing advocates and providers asking how they can replicate this deal-making.

CAPITAL DEVELOPMENTS

For Emily Paradis, co-chair of BBBD and an instructor at the University of Toronto’s urban-studies program, the issue of providing more affordable housing is not a parochial neighbourhood concern – it’s a systemic regional failure.

“Of the hundreds of thousands of new units developed in the past five years, only a tiny fraction … have been affordable to households of low and moderate incomes,” she said. The community group had other concerns, about parkland and community space, but the housing request was rooted in the city’s own estimates. “It didn’t come out of nowhere. The city itself recommended 20 per cent as an appropriate allocation for inclusionary zoning: It’s across from a subway station and part of a major transit area,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

As it happens, the local councillor for Ward 9 is Ana Bailao, a deputy mayor and the city’s affordable-housing czar, who convened a number of meetings over the two years, even urging the parties into mediation to no avail. Then, she invited Habitat for Humanity to join the talks and see if a solution could be found.

“The developer really wanted to get to a yes and really wanted to contribute to the community,” Ms. Bailao said. “I felt they wanted to start on the right foot. They understand they are going to be in the community for a long time; you don’t develop seven acres in a few days.”

After discussing a number of options with Capital Development and BBBD, Mr. Bénard called Mr. Cowan on a Saturday about a month ago and pitched him a new idea: Instead of putting more affordable units on the site, what if the developer gave some money to establish a non-profit land trust that could go and spend that money more efficiently on affordable housing?

“They had put a number on the table that was less than this [the $9-million in cash, an $8-million loan and $2-million for community space], to buy more units on the site,” said Mr. Bénard, but the numbers wouldn’t have been significant.

(The parties call the fund a “land trust”, even though there is no land being transacted – it is an agreement that the money must be spent inside Toronto and Ward 9 on building affordable housing.)

The kind of housing units Habitat likes to build are between 800 and 1,000 square feet. Currently, market prices for units such as a transit-located condominium in Toronto top $1,000 a square foot, which on the Dufferin site would mean about 20 Habitat units.

Story continues below advertisement

But, given the same amount of cash, Mr. Bénard says Habitat can stretch those dollars farther than a private developer can. “Habitat has a philosophy that we’re not building multimillion dollar condos that have granite countertops. When I build a building, I get massive discounts that are then passed onto the families [who buy the below-market units].”

Mr. Bénard thinks Habitat can stretch that land-trust cash to build between 100 and 180 affordable units, and he has hopes of expanding the trust with new donations and commitments from other levels of government to build even more. “Our rule is, for every dollar we get we can multiply that by four … in three to five years, we could see some significant growth in this money,” he said.

Mr. Bénard says his phone has been ringing off the hook with developers, philanthropists and other affordable-housing advocates and providers asking how they can replicate his deal-making.

'We’re trying to do things differently as a company,' says Todd Cowan, Capital Developments co-founder. (Artist rendering).

CAPITAL DEVELOPMENTS

Your house is your most valuable asset. We have a weekly Real Estate newsletter to help you stay on top of news on the housing market, mortgages, the latest closings and more. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies