Skip to main content

File photo of For Rent signs outside of a apartment in Vancouver.

Ben Nelms/The Globe and Mail

One in five Canadian renters face an affordable housing crisis, spending more than half their income on shelter costs, a problem that appears to be even more acute in suburbs and small cities than in major urban centres.

A new study by a coalition of affordable housing groups in six provinces and the Vancouver City Savings Credit Union offers one of the most exhaustive examinations of rental affordability in the country. The group's Canadian Rental Housing Index crunched data on income and rents from Statistics Canada's Survey of Household Spending for more than 1,000 municipalities and regions.

While the data are limited – Statistics Canada's numbers date back to 2011 – the numbers paint a clear picture that renters have not been immune to the soaring costs of Canadian real estate.

Story continues below advertisement

Across the country, 40 per cent of renters spend more than 30 per cent of their household income on the cost of rent and utilities, the level at which many say housing costs become unaffordable. About 20 per cent spent more than half their income, which housing advocates say puts them at high risk of becoming homeless.

"There is a huge segment of the population that has been completely forgotten when it comes to our housing strategy, and that is about half of renters in this country," said Tony Roy, chief executive officer of the BC Non-Profit Housing Association.

While rents tend to be highest in cities such as Toronto, Vancouver and Calgary, the communities facing the greatest affordability crisis tended to be the suburbs, where home prices have been soaring and developers have built little in the way of rental apartments or social housing.

In British Columbia, 31 per cent of renters in West Vancouver spend more than half their income on housing, compared with 25 per cent in the City of Vancouver itself. Communities such as Burnaby, Coquitlam and Richmond are among the worst when it comes to both affordability and supply of rental housing, the group found.

In the Toronto area, average rents are higher in suburban communities such as Milton and Vaughan than in the City of Toronto. Mississauga ranked among the worst cities in the country when it comes to a shortage of affordable rental housing. In Whitchurch-Stouffville, a suburb north of the city, 30 per cent of renters spend more than half their income on shelter costs, the highest in the province and well above the 22 per cent of renters in Toronto.

Affordable-housing advocates say soaring rents in the suburbs are a symptom of a lack of low-cost rental supply in the major cities, where the bulk of the new rental stock has come from high-priced, investor-owned condos. That has pushed many low-income workers, particularly those working in the downtown service industry, farther away from the core in search of housing.

"Eventually you can only move so far," said Sharad Kerur, executive director of the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association. "If you are a service industry worker at the Royal York Hotel, how much farther can you go out to find a home until you start to say, 'I can't do this any more?'"

Story continues below advertisement

Smaller towns and cities face their own challenges. The Western Canada resource boom has brought an influx of transient workers into small communities in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan, driving up rents. In Ontario and B.C., popular vacation destinations for well-heeled summer residents and retirees, such as Muskoka and the Okanagan, are also grappling with high shares of residents who have been priced out of the local rental market.

But the problem appears to be most severe in the small cities that act as magnets for residents living in impoverished rural regions nearby.

In Duncan, B.C., on Vancouver Island, nearly one-third of renters spend more than half their income on housing. Many are workers in low-income jobs or those on social assistance who have moved to the city from the surrounding Cowichan Valley in search of jobs and social services and because the lack of public transit makes it difficult to commute from their home communities, said Joy Emmanuel, affordable housing co-ordinator for the Social Planning Council of Cowichan. "Those kinds of factors all contribute to having a high population that's really spending more than they can afford just on basic shelter."

In Digby, N.S., where 36 per cent of renters spend more than half their income on housing costs, a depressed economy and shrinking work force coupled with an aging housing stock has left the community in dire need of affordable housing. Many of the region's work force has relocated to Western Canada, leaving behind abandoned homes that have fallen into disrepair or gone into foreclosure and cutting off a potential supply of affordable homes for those who remain, said Bernadette MacDonald, executive director of the Tri-County Women's Centre, one of the groups working on an affordable housing strategy for the region.

While affordable housing is often seen as a municipal issue, advocates say the issue should be a high priority for party leaders in the federal election. Much of the country's affordable housing stock dates back several decades, to when the federal government struck agreements to finance mortgages on low-cost apartment buildings. Many of those agreements set to expire over the next several years, spelling the end of $1.7-billion in annual funding from Ottawa and putting as many as a third of the nearly 620,000 affordable housing units at risk of either falling into disrepair or being converted into higher-priced rental suites, Mr. Roy said.

Editor's Note: An earlier version of this online story incorrectly stated that the rental survey is based on data for purpose-built rentals only. In fact, the study includes data for all types of rental accommodation, including condos and single-family homes.

Story continues below advertisement

To check out the Canadian Rental Housing Index interactive online map click here

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter