Skip to main content

For the first time in decades, demand for rental housing is outpacing ownership, driving rent prices higher and deepening Canada’s housing affordability woes.

Between 2011 and 2016, nearly 753,000 new households were formed. About 396,000 of those were rentals, which now account for 32 per cent of the country’s homes, according to data from the 2018 Canadian Rental Housing Index.

Over the same period, the percentage of home ownership fell from 68.9 per cent to 67.8 per cent, the first drop since 1971.

Story continues below advertisement

“For 50 years, we’ve been trending toward home ownership, but now that average and even upper-income workers are being priced out of home ownership, they are staying in rental housing for far longer,” said Jill Atkey, acting chief executive and managing director of the BC Non-Profit Housing Association.

The housing advocacy agency developed the index, which measures pressures on renters in 800 cities and regions. This edition of the index uses 2016’s long-form census, while the index compiled in 2015 used the 2011 National Household Survey.

Ms. Atkey said Canada is facing a critical shortage in supply of new purpose-built rental housing. Even though the federal government has rolled out additional investments in affordable rental housing, and Quebec and B.C. have incentives and building plans for more rentals, she said many of those plans won’t bear significant fruit until 2020 and beyond.

“We’ve been saying for a couple of years the situation is going to get worse before it gets better,” Ms. Atkey said. “I think what the data show us is we are in that period where it’s getting worse. It’s not a situation that can be fixed overnight.”

The new index also includes metrics on overcrowding and overspending, and shows 18 per cent of the country’s renters are devoting at least 50 per cent of their income to pay for shelter − a number the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. defines as crisis-level spending, putting those people at risk of homelessness.

The five provinces with the highest share of people in the 50-per-cent category are B.C. (21 per cent); Ontario (20.9 per cent); Nova Scotia (19 per cent); Newfoundland and Labrador (17 per cent); and Saskatchewan (16.4 per cent). Those households on the bottom of the income scale are dramatically more likely to be paying too much for rent: In Ontario, 60 per cent of those making less than $22,385 are in the 50-per-cent-for-rent group; in B.C., they are 66 per cent; in Nova Scotia, 63 per cent.

The CMHC defines a household paying 30 per cent of its income as having affordability challenges, which would describe 40 per cent of Canada’s renters. Not surprisingly the same five provinces have the highest share of renters with affordability issues but, Ontario and B.C. lead the way with 45.7 per cent and 43.3 per cent respectively of households struggling to pay rent.

Story continues below advertisement

Another trend in the data is that affordability challenges have migrated from the biggest cities to their urban fringes. Some of the most expensive average rents in the country are from so-called bedroom communities, such as Airdrie, Alta., which saw its population soar to more than 64,900 in 2017 from 16,000 in 1997, but has just 3,755 rental households with an average rent of $1,597. Meanwhile, just minutes south is Calgary with 131,660 rental households with average rents of $1,355.

Vaughan, near Toronto, has one of the highest average rents in Ontario at $1,586 and there are 3,640 rental households spending at least half their income to house themselves (about 32 per cent of the city’s 9,700 renters, and that proportion shoots up to 70 per cent of the lowest-income residents). Similar patterns play out communities such as St. Catharines, Peterborough and in London, where about 10,800 of the city’s 64,960 rental households fall into the lowest income quartile and are paying about half their income on rents, which are about $744 on average.

“I think what we’re seeing, very literally on a map, is poverty being pushed out into outlying areas; the cost of housing is not lining up with the pace of income,” said Marlene Coffey, executive director of the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association.

In the Greater Toronto Area, for example, Ms. Coffey said, between 2011 and 2016, average rents went up 21 per cent while wage growth was just 13 per cent. “When you push affordability challenges in to smaller communities, they may not have the affordable rental housing stock there; people are creative, they do things like live in crowded dwellings.”

The index’s overcrowding data are starkest in Canada’s north, known for having some of the most acute housing shortages in the country. More than 80 per cent of Nunavut households are rented, and the Baffin, Keewatin and Kitikmeot regions combine for 2,660 overcrowded rental households, which while a small number in absolute terms represent 29 per cent, 40 per cent and 41 per cent respectively of the total rental supply.

The outlier in the index is Quebec, which has some of the lowest provincial average rents at $775 and some of the lowest proportions of overcrowding and overspending despite having the highest proportion of rental households at 39 per cent, and the second-highest count of total rental households (1.3 million) in the country behind Ontario.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter