Skip to main content

Construction of a condominium project in Toronto is seen in this file photo.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Toronto's condo sector has seen rising numbers of newly built, but unsold condos this year, raising red flags among some industry watchers. But Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce economist Benjamin Tal insists those who see the trend as a sign of a condo bubble about to pop "are barking up the wrong tree."

There are 2,000 completed, but unsold condos in the Greater Toronto Area, Mr. Tal wrote in a research note released Monday morning, about double the number there were in December, and above the long-term average for the region. Nearly half of those are in the City of Toronto. Many are the echoes of record levels of housing starts in 2012, when developers began construction on 50,000 homes, of which 30,000 were condos.

But, Mr. Tal notes, high levels of unsold units are not a region-wide phenomenon. In fact, a quarter of unsold condos are in just five buildings, out of 139 active projects, he says. Almost a third could be attributed to just four out of 77 builders. (Mr. Tal does not detail which projects, or builders, are facing a backlog of unsold units.) While he dismisses the idea that Toronto's condo market is facing "increased vulnerability," he does see stiff headwinds ahead for the sector. "To be sure, the GTA's condo market will be tested as interest rates start rising in the coming years, and increased resale activity from domestic condo investors will result in excess supply and some downward pressure on prices," he writes.

Story continues below advertisement

Vancouver, meanwhile, is facing the opposite issue. The number of completed but unsold condos in the city has fallen from more than 2,000 last year to 1,100 this year, the lowest in five years.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.