Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Pacific NorthWest LNG is proposing to build an LNG export terminal on Lelu Island.

lonniewishart.com

Ten First Nations leaders in northern British Columbia have formed a new alliance to draw attention to their environmental concerns that range from hydraulic fracturing to exporting liquefied natural gas.

One project that is raising ecological alarm bells is Pacific NorthWest LNG, said Donnie Wesley, a hereditary chief of the Gitwilgyoots, one of nine allied tribes of the Lax Kw'alaams.

Pacific NorthWest LNG, led by Malaysia's state-owned Petronas, wants to take natural gas from northeastern British Columbia and pipe the commodity to a planned export terminal on Lelu Island in the northwest part of the province.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Wesley appeared with other native leaders Tuesday at a news conference in Vancouver. Two weeks ago, he helped set up a camp on Lelu Island in what he calls the peaceful occupation of land that is part of the traditional territory of the Lax Kw'alaams.

The native leaders also say they are worried about the pace of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in northeastern British Columbia. In fracking operations, large amounts of water are mixed with chemicals and pumped into the ground to extract natural gas. Critics have expressed worries about potential water contamination.

Ten First Nations leaders signed a statement that they have sent to B.C. Premier Christy Clark.

"A more civil, legally consistent and logical approach to major project development that recognizes our laws and legal orders, and addresses the failures, is needed," according to the three-page statement. The aboriginal leaders are calling for greater scrutiny of the cumulative impacts of energy projects such as LNG proposals in the northwest and BC Hydro's planned $8.8-billion Site C Dam in the northeast.

The proposed Lelu Island terminal site, which has forested areas spread over bog deposits, would be next to Flora Bank in the Skeena River estuary. Some First Nations groups are worried about the potential impact that building an export terminal will have on juvenile salmon habitat in Flora Bank.

Pacific NorthWest LNG, which is awaiting regulatory approval from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, said recently that while there will be workers near Lelu Island, such activity does not mark the beginning of construction. "In particular, it is important for us to collect supplemental information to support and validate our proposed marine facility's design," Pacific NorthWest LNG said. "No sampling activity will take place on Flora Bank, and work will be conducted in a safe and environmentally sensitive manner, with no adverse effects to marine life."

In voting in May, members of the Lax Kw'alaams declined to provide aboriginal consent by overwhelmingly rejecting Pacific NorthWest LNG's $1-billion cash offer over 40 years.

Story continues below advertisement

The Petronas-led consortium has said that it carefully assessed 20 sites and selected Lelu Island from a shortlist of five locations.

Mr. Wesley said the environmental review process has been flawed, arguing that nearby Ridley Island would be a better site for an LNG export terminal. But BG Group PLC's Prince Rupert LNG project holds the development rights for a large parcel of land on Ridley Island. BG and Royal Dutch Shell PLC announced plans in April to merge.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies