Skip to main content

The sun and sundogs rise above the Inuvik-to-Tuktoyaktuk highway which is under construction near the Beaufort Sea coast.

Jeffrey Jones/The Globe and Mail

This is part of a series looking at infrastructure projects designed to create economic opportunities in the North.

Before the end of the year, Imperial Oil Ltd. and its partners must inform the National Energy Board of its intentions with the Mackenzie gas project, the $16.2-billion pipeline from the Arctic which has stalled due to the flood of cheaper supplies closer to major North American markets.

The people of the Northwest Territories have waited for years for the project to get under way, but with the shale gas revolution in full swing it is doubtful that it will proceed as proposed. In October, Imperial CEO Rich Kruger told The Globe and Mail that the company is studying a revamp of Mackenzie that could see it reborn as part of a larger initiative for export of liquefied natural gas, though a plan is far from finalized.

Story continues below advertisement

In the short term, it means more delay for a northern region anxious for economic growth and jobs. But Dave Ramsay, the NWT's Minister of Industry, Tourism and Investment, believes the move is positive in the long term as it means that the three major gas fields in the Mackenzie Delta that anchor the pipeline could still be developed. Meanwhile, future energy proposals will be made as the territory gets more decision-making power from Ottawa under the devolution process.

What is your view of the current thinking about the Mackenzie project?

That possibility is real. It's not something they dreamt up. So for us, that's the best news we've heard on the project in some time. Just the fact that the proponents are still interested in constructing that pipeline is good news for us. If it's five or 10 years out, it's something that we can hopefully look forward to for getting Mackenzie gas to market.

With what is happening in the central Mackenzie Valley with tight oil (the Canol shale oil prospect near Norman Wells, NWT), if that does become a commercially viable play, then all of a sudden there are tremendous amounts of natural gas and natural gas liquids that are going to be produced as a by-product of the oil extraction. That needs to find a way out to market, so that might enter into the economic viability of the Mackenzie gas project itself.

As the NWT takes on powers under the devolution process, what lessons do you take from the regulatory review for Mackenzie, which took six years, a period in which the gas market changed?

We're not interested in seeing long, drawn-out processes that are going to take opportunities away from our territory. We can use the size of our government to our advantage. We're not some big, cumbersome bureaucracy. We can see the direct impact that decisions are going to have on people, on the economy and on our environment, and we can act accordingly.

Do you foresee Mackenzie gas being converted to LNG in the North, with operations aided by the new highway, or flowing to the British Columbia coast for liquefaction?

Story continues below advertisement

The more likely scenario is that Mackenzie gas feeds facilities in B.C., but that could change. Still, we'd be looking at $20-billion investment by the proponents.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies