Skip to main content

People walk to Brookfield Place off Bay Street on the day of the annual general meeting for Brookfield Asset Management shareholders in Toronto, May 7, 2014.

MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. has hiked its offer to other shareholders of Brookfield Residential Properties Inc. by 5.4 per cent as it seeks to acquire full ownership of the North American land developer and homebuilder.

Brookfield Asset Management and its affiliates already own nearly 70 per cent of BRP's shares and is now offering US$24.25 cash for each share that it doesn't already own.

The price is up 5.4 per cent higher than the the initial offer of US$23 announced Oct. 23. BRP shares closed Tuesday at US$22.86 in New York and C$26.57 in Toronto prior to the announcement.

Story continues below advertisement

If all 35.9 million shares subject to the offer are sold, the deal will cost Brookfield Asset about US$870.6-million cash and value Brookfield Residential at about US$2.84-billion.

Brookfield Residential operates in 11 major markets, including Calgary, Edmonton, the Toronto area and several major U.S. cities. (Austin, Denver, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco and the Washington, D.C., area.)

BRP's board is supporting the proposal and has scheduled a special meeting of shareholders for March 10. To be completed, the offer requires approval from at least two-thirds of votes cast and a majority of votes cast by shareholders other than Brookfield Management. It also requires approval from the Ontario Superior Court.

"We believe that the transaction offers strong value for Brookfield Residential shareholders, and we look forward to working towards its successful completion in early 2015," said Cyrus Madon, senior managing partner for Brookfield Asset Management.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies