Skip to main content

C-Suite's survey finds varying opinion on Keystone XL's positive impact.

Terray Sylvest/Reute

As TransCanada Corp.'s Keystone XL pipeline moves closer to approval, a minority of Canadian business leaders say they'll be directly, positively impacted by it. But six in 10 say they won't be impacted at all, drawing attention to divisions of opinion across regions and industries.

Half of Canada's resource executives said U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order to revive the pipeline will be positive for business, though more than half of that group believe it will only "somewhat" impact them. Only a third of service executives see a positive impact. Half of the executives surveyed in Western Canada, meanwhile, were bullish on the pipeline – twice as many as the rest of the country.

Of those who found Mr. Trump's pipeline order positive, a third said it will help them increase market access and a fifth said it would boost the West's economy and build support for oil-and-gas investment. In March, TransCanada received a presidential permit to build the pipeline, though it now faces approvals in Nebraska and significant opposition from environmental and aboriginal groups.

Story continues below advertisement

Even some oil-patch executives have their own versions of skepticism for a single pipeline as a sector saviour. "It locks more of our production into a single end user," says John Wright, chief executive of Ridgeback Resources Inc., referring to the United States. While he believes Keystone would be a short-term win for improving oil prices and volumes, "in the long term, it's going to be harder for us to develop other markets for our crude."

Read more: Canada's CEOs are optimistic, but not hot on Trump

Read more: Trump's temperament remains a key sticking point for CEOs

Read more: Canadian executives offer a mixed bag of perspectives on U.S. President's performance

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.